On 12/06/2018 23:43, Mark Jeftovic wrote: Hi Mark, No, it doesn't work that way. You need to add the zone to the config of the slave and call "knotc reload" on it.

I misread the docs, sorry and thanks for the reply. I thought it worked similar to the PowerDNS supermaster concept.

Is there any way to dynamically add zones remotely? Similar to BIND's rndc across the network?

Hi Antti, As far as I know, catalog zones are implemented by Bind only and still it's in a draft state. We haven't decided yet how and when to implement this or alternative functionality. Daniel On 06/15/2018 05:34 AM, Antti Ristimäki wrote: > Hi list, > > This was a very good question, as for example we have sometimes > investigated the possibility to dynamically configure zones by incoming > notify messages. This leads me to a question, whether or not Knot is > going to support catalog zones? Or is the whole catalog zone concept > only Bind specific feature? > > Antti > > > On 13.06.2018 00:43, Mark Jeftovic wrote: >> Hi, just getting up to speedon knotDNS and trying to get dynamically >> added secondaries working via bootstrapping. >> >> My understanding is when the server receives a notify from an authorized >> master, if it is not already in the zone like it will add it and AXFR >> it, right? >> >> In my conf: >> >> acl: >>   - id: "acl_master" >>     address: "64.68.198.83" >>     address: "64.68.198.91" >>     action: "notify" >> >> remote: >>   - id: "master" >>     address: "64.68.198.83@53" >>     address: "64.68.198.91@53" >> >> But whenever I send NOTIFY from either of those masters, nothing happens >> on the knotDNS side. I have my logging as: >> >> log: >>   - target: "syslog" >>     any: "debug" >> >> >> Thx >> >> - mark >> >>

if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ combine it with the https://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-server s/. Add a little bit integration coding and that's it. :)

On 2.7.2018 12:28, Klaus Darilion wrote: All these are mere hacks, cleanest solution would be YANG model for zone management.

> On 2 Jul 2018, at 12:45, Petr Špaček <petr.spacek(a)nic.cz> wrote: > > On 2.7.2018 12:28, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Am 18.06.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Peter Hudec: >>> if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at >>> http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ >>> >>> combine it with the >>> https://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-s

>>> >>>

s/YANG/a provisioning/ YANG is just an implementation of provisioning interface. And I believe there are much better solutions to pick from. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ondrej(a)sury.org