27 Dub
2012
27 Dub
'12
12:45
Hi,
After moving one of my authoritative nameservers from bind to nsd, I
thought why not migrate another one to knot, it seems nice... :-)
So, I started writing a small script to output the knot conf bits I needed
only to find out that I can't find a way to do includes, like I do with
bind or nsd.
What's the usual way to do that kind of things ?
Is it possible to have more than one keys, remotes and zones sections ?
Regards,
--
Mathieu Arnold
2 Kvě
2 Kvě
9:59
Hi Mathieu,
On 27. 4. 2012, at 12:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Hi,
After moving one of my authoritative nameservers from bind to nsd, I
thought why not migrate another one to knot, it seems nice... :-)
So, I started writing a small script to output the knot conf bits I needed
only to find out that I can't find a way to do includes, like I do with
bind or nsd.
What's the usual way to do that kind of things ?
I have created https://git.nic.cz/redmine/issues/1862 to track your request,
as we think it's a good idea to allow includes in the config section.
Is it possible to have more than one keys, remotes and
zones sections ?
I don't think so, but this could be easily solved by allowing nested includes,
i.e. includes inside the section. We'll add this to our release plan.
Meanwhile I suggest to create simple script to assemble final configuration
file together.
And last note: if you are going to use Knot DNS with many zone files, please
wait for 1.0.4, where we significantly (2x) improved loading time of many zone
files. We need to nail down one last hard-to-find segfault we experience after
few days of runtime and we will be doing the final 1.0.4 release. Or for testing
purposes you can use development branch from git, where are all the necessary fixes
right now.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer
-------------------------------------------
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC
Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/
tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112
-------------------------------------------
10:15
+--On 2 mai 2012 09:59:59 +0200 Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury(a)nic.cz> wrote:
| I have created https://git.nic.cz/redmine/issues/1862 to track your
| request, as we think it's a good idea to allow includes in the config
| section.
|
|> Is it possible to have more than one keys, remotes and zones sections ?
|
| I don't think so, but this could be easily solved by allowing nested
| includes, i.e. includes inside the section. We'll add this to our
| release plan.
Great, thanks :-)
| And last note: if you are going to use Knot DNS with many zone files,
| please wait for 1.0.4, where we significantly (2x) improved loading time
| of many zone files. We need to nail down one last hard-to-find segfault
| we experience after few days of runtime and we will be doing the final
| 1.0.4 release. Or for testing purposes you can use development branch
| from git, where are all the necessary fixes right now.
I have a bit less than 3k zones, I don't know if it's considered a lot or
not :-)
But I can wait for 1.0.4 all right, these servers have been running bind
for like 14 years now (well, it's not the same servers, like the sparc ipx
I had as a ns1 is long gone) so, I'm in no real hurry.
--
Mathieu Arnold
10:15
Hi, just want to chime in - it's possible to have multiple
remotes/zones/keys sections.
Nevertheless it's not as clean solution as having includes you suggested.
Kind regards,
Marek
--
Marek Vavruša Knot DNS
CZ.NIC Labs http://www.knot-dns.cz
-------------------------------------------
Americká 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
WWW: http://labs.nic.cz http://www.nic.cz
On 27 April 2012 12:45, Mathieu Arnold <mat(a)mat.cc> wrote:
Hi,
After moving one of my authoritative nameservers from bind to nsd, I
thought why not migrate another one to knot, it seems nice... :-)
So, I started writing a small script to output the knot conf bits I needed
only to find out that I can't find a way to do includes, like I do with
bind or nsd.
What's the usual way to do that kind of things ?
Is it possible to have more than one keys, remotes and zones sections ?
Regards,
--
Mathieu Arnold
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
10:17
+--On 2 mai 2012 10:15:01 +0200 Marek Vavruša <marek.vavrusa(a)nic.cz> wrote:
| Hi, just want to chime in - it's possible to have multiple
| remotes/zones/keys sections.
So it makes things a bit easier for me, thanks for the input.
--
Mathieu Arnold
4387
days inactive
4392
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Marek Vavruša -
Mathieu Arnold -
Ondřej Surý