[knot-dns-users] *****SPAM***** Re: knot 1.4.4 and problem with journal size - zone not loaded

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.nic.cz", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, thanks for the answer. Deleting and setting ixfr-fslimit didn't helped, I had to replace zone file from my backup, ehh. Thanks and best regards J.K. > Hi, > > You can try setting > https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/1.6/singlehtml/index.html#ixfr-fslimit or > simply deleting the journal file corresponding to the ajetaci.cz zone. : >> journal size is too small to fit the changes. >> >> Knot is owner of this directory. >> >> After loading zone I found that record on some line in the zone file >> is >> invalid, I deleted it, increased serial and after reloading zone I could >> not set it UP >> >> >> Log records about the zone: 2015110901) >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: DNSSEC: Zone ajetaci.cz. - Signing >> started... >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: DNSSEC: Zone ajetaci.cz. - - Key is >> valid, tag 36256, file Kajetaci.cz.+005+36256.private, KSK, active, >> public >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: DNSSEC: Zone ajetaci.cz. - - Key is >> valid, tag 11937, file Kajetaci.cz.+005+11937.private, ZSK, active, >> public >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: DNSSEC: Zone ajetaci.cz. - - Key is >> valid, tag 5300, file Kajetaci.cz.+007+05300.private, ZSK, active, >> public >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: DNSSEC: Zone ajetaci.cz. - - Key is >> valid, tag 58830, file Kajetaci.cz.+007+58830.private, KSK, active, >> public >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: [error] Zone 'ajetaci.cz.' journal >> size >> is too small to fit the changes. >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: Loaded 2 out of 3 zones. >> Nov 9 08:22:14 celer knot[20407]: [warning] Not all the zones were >> loaded. >> >> >> Any ideas ? >> Thanks and best regards >> J. > > [...] Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4981] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 3.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid