Hi all,
I would like to kindly ask you to check the Debian repository state? It
looks like it is a bit outdated... The latest version available is
2.6.7-1+0~20180710153240.24+stretch~1.gbpfa6f52 while 2.7.0 has been
already released.
Thanks
BR
Ales Rygl
Hey,
We're scripting around Knot, and for that we pipe sequences of commands
to knotc. We're running into a few wishes for improved rigour that look
like they are generic:
1. WAITING FOR TRANSACTION LOCKS
This would make our scripts more reliably, especially when we need to do
manual operations on the command line as well. There should be no hurry
for detecting lock freeing operations immediately, so retries with
exponential backoff would be quite alright for us.
Deadlocks are an issue when these are nested, so this would at best be
an option to knotc, but many applications call for a single level and
these could benefit from the added sureness of holding the lock.
2. FAILING ON PARTIAL OPERATIONS
When we script a *-begin, act1, act2, *-commit, and pipe it into knotc
it is not possible to see intermediate results. This could be solved
when any failures (including for non-locking *-begin) would *-abort and
return a suitable exit code. Only success in *-commit would exit(0) and
that would allow us to detect overall success.
We've considered making a wrapper around knotc, but that might actually
reduce its quality and stability, so instead we now propose these features.
Just let me know if you'd like to see the above as a patch (and a repo
to use for it).
Cheers,
-Rick
Hello,
I am seeing segfault crashes from knot + libknot7 version 2.6.8-1~ubuntu
for amd64, during a zone commit cycle. The transaction is empty by the
way, but in general we use a utility to compare Ist to Soll.
This came up while editing a zone that hasn't been configured yet, so we
are obviously doing something strange. (The reason is I'm trying to
switch DNSSEC on/off in a manner orthogonal to the zone data transport,
which is quite clearly not what Knot DNS was designed for. I will post
a feature request that could really help with orthogonality.)
I'll attach two flows, occurring virtually at the same time on our two
machines while doing the same thing locally; so the bug looks
reproducable. If you need more information, I'll try to see what I can do.
Cheers,
-Rick
Jul 24 14:22:59 menezes knotd[17733]: info: [example.com.] control,
received command 'zone-commit'
Jul 24 14:22:59 menezes kernel: [1800163.196199] knotd[17733]: segfault
at 0 ip 00007f375a659410 sp 00007ffde37d46d8 error 4 in
libknot.so.7.0.0[7f375a64b000+2d000]
Jul 24 14:22:59 menezes systemd[1]: knot.service: Main process exited,
code=killed, status=11/SEGV
Jul 24 14:22:59 menezes systemd[1]: knot.service: Unit entered failed state.
Jul 24 14:22:59 menezes systemd[1]: knot.service: Failed with result
'signal'.
Jul 24 14:22:59 vanstone knotd[6473]: info: [example.com.] control,
received command 'zone-commit'
Jul 24 14:22:59 vanstone kernel: [3451862.795573] knotd[6473]: segfault
at 0 ip 00007ffb6e817410 sp 00007ffd2b6e1d58 error 4 in
libknot.so.7.0.0[7ffb6e809000+2d000]
Jul 24 14:22:59 vanstone systemd[1]: knot.service: Main process exited,
code=killed, status=11/SEGV
Jul 24 14:22:59 vanstone systemd[1]: knot.service: Unit entered failed
state.
Jul 24 14:22:59 vanstone systemd[1]: knot.service: Failed with result
'signal'.
Hi,
after updating from 2.6.8 to 2.7.0 none of my zones gets loaded:
failed to load persistent timers (invalid parameter)
error: [nord-west.org.] zone cannot be created
How can I fix this?
Kind Regards
Bjoern
Hi all,
I would kindly ask for help. After a tiny zone record modification I am
receiving following error(s) when trying to access zone data (zone-read):
Aug 02 15:09:34 idunn knotd[779]: warning: [xxxxxxxx.] failed to update
zone file (not enough space provided)
Aug 02 15:09:34 idunn knotd[779]: error: [xxxxxxx.] zone event 'journal
flush' failed (not enough space provided)
There is a plenty of space on the server, I suppose it is related to
journal and db.
Many thanks in advance, it is quite important zone.
KNOT 2.6.7-1+0~20180710153240.24+stretch~1.gbpfa6f52
BR
Ales Rygl
Hi,
I would like to ask about the implementation of the Resource records in
RRSet in KnotDNS.
I have the domain with the three TXT record with same class IN for the
same label ('@') and with the different TTLs. In nsd and bind DNS
servers seems everything fine, but in KnotDNS I got the warning and error:
knotd[551]: warning: [xxxxxxx.xxx.] zone loader, RRSet TTLs mismatched,
node 'xxxxxxx.xxx.' (record type TXT)
knotd[551]: error: [xxxxxxx.xxx.] zone loader, failed to load zone, file
'/etc/knot/files/master.gen/xxxxxxx.xxx' (TTL mismatch)
knotd[551]: error: [xxxxxxx.xxx.] failed to parse zonefile (failed)
knotd[551]: error: [xxxxxxx.xxx.] zone event 'load' failed (failed)
Is it a correct behavior and other DNS servers don't check it or is it a
bug in KnotDNS?
Thank you for reply.
Cheers,
--
Zdenek
Hi,
I am trying to make DNSSEC signing orthogonal to zone data transport in
the DNSSEC signer solution for SURFnet. This translates directly to an
intuitive user interface, where domain owners can toggle DNSSEC on and
off with a flick of a switch.
Interestingly, keymgr can work orthogonally to zone data; keys can be
added and removed, regardless of whether a zone has been setup in Knot DNS.
Where the orthogonality is broken, is that I need to explicitly set
dnssec-signing: to on or off. This means that I need to create a zone,
just to be able to tell Knot DNS about the keys. Of course there are
complaints when configuring Knot DNS without a zone data file present.
The most elegant approach would be to setup dnssec-signing as
opportunistic option, meaning "precisely then when there are keys
available in the keymgr for this zone". Such a setting could then end
up in the policy for any such zone, and that can be done when the zone
data is first sent, without regards of what we try to make an orthogonal
dimension.
I have no idea if this is difficult to make. I do think it may be a use
case that wasn't considered before, which is why I'm posting it here.
If this is easy and doable, please let me know; otherwise I will have to
work around Knot DNS (ignoring errors, overruling previously set content
just to be sure it is set, and so on) to achieve the desired orthogonality.
Cheers,
-Rick
