knot-dns-users

knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz

1 participants
744 discussions

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.9.7! This is a bugfix version of previous stable branch. It's recommended to update from older 2.9.x versions if you serve DNSSEC signed zones with NSEC3. Knot DNS 3.0.1 will be released tomorrow. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.7/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.9/html Support and sponsorship: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

5 let, 1 měsíc

Debugging high CPU / Load - normal?

by Jonathan Hewlett

Hi, We run around 50 knot servers around the world, with great success - thanks for the software! We are just a little curious about seemingly high CPU usage, and how best to interpret the results, if someone could advise? Specifically, we are seeing the majority of the cpu time in 'system' and not 'user', what would that suggest is happening perhaps? Any tuning help gratefully received! Our platform (sample) 24 Core CPU E5-2440 0 @ 2.40 64Gb RAM SSD knot-2.9.5, running on Centos 8.2 Currently receiving around 4k pps Server is authoritative for a 278 zones, the largest zone file being around 600Mb Output of top top - 20:50:38 up 6 days, 4:49, 2 users, load average: 13.47, 12.34, 11.83 Tasks: 321 total, 2 running, 318 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie %Cpu0 : 4.0 us, 34.1 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.3 id, 0.3 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu1 : 4.3 us, 19.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu2 : 4.3 us, 33.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu3 : 5.0 us, 21.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu4 : 3.3 us, 34.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 61.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu5 : 3.0 us, 20.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu6 : 4.0 us, 35.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu7 : 5.0 us, 18.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu8 : 2.0 us, 35.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 62.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu9 : 2.0 us, 20.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 77.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu10 : 3.7 us, 34.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 61.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu11 : 3.3 us, 20.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu12 : 2.3 us, 34.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 62.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu13 : 3.3 us, 20.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu14 : 2.3 us, 33.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 59.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 3.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu15 : 3.3 us, 19.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu16 : 2.3 us, 34.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 58.7 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 4.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu17 : 2.3 us, 21.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu18 : 3.3 us, 34.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 57.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 4.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu19 : 5.0 us, 19.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu20 : 2.7 us, 35.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 1.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu21 : 1.7 us, 20.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 77.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu22 : 4.7 us, 32.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 58.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 3.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu23 : 2.3 us, 19.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st MiB Mem : 64107.4 total, 46764.9 free, 11733.6 used, 5608.8 buff/cache MiB Swap: 32248.0 total, 32248.0 free, 0.0 used. 51670.0 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 213370 knot 20 0 34.0g 9.6g 41784 S 644.9 15.3 1319:12 /usr/sbin/knotd Thanks again for this great product. Jonathan

5 let, 1 měsíc

Catalog zone configuration/zone auto configuration bootstrapping

by Frank Matthieß

Hello all, i stuck a little bit with the configuration of the new catalog zone feature in knot dns 3.0.0. The catalog zone replication is running quite well, but bootstrapping this feature to replicate the config for zones wont work for me. The zone name of the catalog zone is "zone.catalog". The primary name server uses this config: > # Configuration export (Knot DNS 3.0.0) > zone: > - domain: "zone.catalog." > file: "%s" > notify: [ "ns1.frank.REDACTED.DOM", "ns2.frank.REDACTED.DOM" ] > acl: [ "ns1.frank.REDACTED.DOM", "ns2.frank.REDACTED.DOM" ] > catalog-role: "interpret" > catalog-template: "catalog-zone-template" > > - domain: "dom-siew9tho.invalid." The zone has this content: > [zone.catalog.] zone.catalog. 60 NS nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. > [zone.catalog.] zone.catalog. 60 SOA nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. hostmaster.REDACTED.DOM. 1601540072 16384 2048 1048576 2560 > [zone.catalog.] id-ies3eidiev4ooquahgoh.zone.catalog. 0 PTR dom-siew9tho.invalid. > [zone.catalog.] version.zone.catalog. 0 TXT "2" Adding the following config to the primary works: > conf-begin > conf-set zone.domain "dom-siew9tho.invalid." > conf-commit > zone-begin dom-siew9tho.invalid. > zone-set dom-siew9tho.invalid. @ 60 SOA nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. hostmaster.REDACTED.DOM. 1 16384 2048 1048576 2560 > zone-set dom-siew9tho.invalid. @ 60 NS nshp.REDACTED.DOM. > zone-commit dom-siew9tho.invalid. Query one of the secondaries (ns1) gives me: > error: (no such zone found) [dom-siew9tho.invalid.] The config of ns1: > # Configuration export (Knot DNS 3.0.0) > template: > - id: "catalog-zone-template" > storage: "/var/lib/knot/zones" > file: "%s" > semantic-checks: "on" > dnssec-signing: "off" > serial-policy: "unixtime" > kasp-db: "/var/lib/knot/kasp-db" > > zone: > - domain: "zone.catalog." > file: "%s" > master: "nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM" > acl: "nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM" > catalog-role: "interpret" > catalog-template: "catalog-zone-template" I'm sure i miss one or more parts and/or i have a serious misunderstanding of the bootstrapping setup for this feature. - frank -- Frank Matthieß Mail: frank.matthiess(a)virtion.de phone: +49 521 44 81 58 17 GnuPG: 9F81 BD57 C898 6059 86AA 0E9B 6B23 DE93 01BB 63D1 virtion GmbH Südring 11, DE 33647 Bielefeld Geschäftsführer: Michael Kutzner Handelsregister HRB 40374, Amtsgericht Bielefeld, USt-IdNr.: DE278312983

5 let, 1 měsíc

copy key from one instance to another

by Ulrich Wisser

Hi! For a special project I need to sign the same zone on two servers with the same key. How can I create a key and import it in both instances? Or export an automatically generated key from one instance and import in the other instance? Kind regards from Stockholm /Ulrich

5 let, 2 měsíce

termination of obsolete Knot DNS OBS repos

by Jakub Ružička

Following obsolete OBS package repositories will be terminated without mercy on Friday 18th September 2020: * [knot-dns](https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:CZ-NIC:knot-dns) * [knot-dns-latest](https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:CZ-NIC:knot-d… If you are using these repos, please refer to [Knot DNS download page](https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/) for links to current package repos for your favourite distribution. Jakub Ružička CZ.NIC packager

5 let, 2 měsíce

Knot DNS 3.0.0 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.0! This version introduces lots of new features. You can read more about them on this blog post https://en.blog.nic.cz/2020/09/09/knot-dns-3-0-news/ Don't forget to check the updated benchmarks https://www.knot-dns.cz/benchmark/ Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.0/NEWS Migration: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html/migration.html#upgrade-2-9-x-to-3-0-x Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html Support and sponsorship: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

5 let, 2 měsíce

Knot DNS 2.9.6 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.9.6! This is mostly a bug fix version with some small improvements. Just a notice, on September 9th we are going to release Knot DNS 3.0.0, which will become a new Current Latest version. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.6/NEWS Source code: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.9.6.tar.xz https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.9.6.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.9/html Support and funding: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

5 let, 2 měsíce

keymgr doesn't delete (remove) keys

by Chris

I'm currently on 2.6.5, and am moving everything to a new server I've created that's using the newest version. However, I've got a couple of zones I am trying to clean up before the move. In my effort to resign these zones, I'm retiring/removing keys associated with these zones prior to resigning them. But keymgr(8) isn't working as expected. eg; 12:25pm Fri, 21 # keymgr some.zone. set 09696 retire=20200821122736 remove=20200821122755 12:28pm Fri, 21 # keymgr some.zone. list iso ... 83ded1e7f4375657fe12ca666d4bbc6c33b7edea ksk=no zsk=yes tag=09696 algorithm=5 public-only=no created=2020-05-06T04:42:32 pre-active=2020-05-06T04:42:32 publish=2020-05-06T05:42:32 ready=1970-01-01T00:00:00 active=2020-05-06T18:42:32 retire-active=1970-01-01T00:00:00 retire=2020-08-21T12:27:36 post-active=1970-01-01T00:00:00 remove=2020-08-21T12:27:55 ... As you can see, it's 12:28 but the key was not removed. What am I (missing/misunderstanding? Thanks. --Chris

5 let, 2 měsíce

KSK and ZKS roll-overs on schedule

by Thomas

Hi, I have another requirement for a capability test. I need to perform ZSK and KSK rollovers on specific times. Something like KSK rollover after exactly 60 hours. Or ZSK rollover after exactly 24 hours and another one after another 24 hours. And so on... One additional requirement is that I need to pre-generate the keys. I was thinking of doing it with manual key management enabled and to use the keymgr tool for it. But I'm unsure about how to set the key attributes correctly an in what order. At what point I have to set the new key to active, and how can I remove the old key, and so on... I have never done it manually as I normally use Knots automatic key management. Is the "knotc zone-key-rollover" useful here, or is it only useful in an automatic key management set up? I really appreciate any help here! Thanks a lot, Thomas

5 let, 3 měsíce

Re: [knot-dns-users] Unexpected behaviour of `knotc zone-set` when adding a TXT record

by Daniel Salzman

Hello, You have to escape the quotes: zone-set bastetrix.com @ 86400 TXT \"v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com -all\" Regards, Daniel On 8/9/20 4:47 AM, Sadiq Saif wrote: > Hi all, > > Today I ran into some unexpected behaviour, I wanted to make a modification to the TTL (3600->86400) for the SPF TXT record for bastetrix.com, so I did the following: > > zone-set bastetrix.com @ 86400 TXT "v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com -all" > > But the result was unexpected, instead of modifying the record, I got a new record that looked like this: > > bastetrix.com. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1" "include:spf.messagingengine.com" " -all" > > RFC 7208 Section 3.3: > > 3.3. Multiple Strings in a Single DNS Record > > As defined in [RFC1035], Sections 3.3 and 3.3.14, a single text DNS > record can be composed of more than one string. If a published > record contains multiple character-strings, then the record MUST be > treated as if those strings are concatenated together without adding > spaces. For example: > > IN TXT "v=spf1 .... first" "second string..." > > is equivalent to: > > IN TXT "v=spf1 .... firstsecond string..." > > TXT records containing multiple strings are useful in constructing > records that would exceed the 255-octet maximum length of a > character-string within a single TXT record. > > If I'm not misreading this bit of the RFC, that record would result in a wrongly formatted SPF record without the correct spaces. > > And indeed when I added the same SPF record to another zone (bastetrix.net) using `knotc zone set` Fastmail's DNS record checker said that I had not added a SPF record. I had to edit the zone by hand in a text editor to fix the issue. > > Is this a bug in `knotc zone-set` or intended behaviour? Am I misunderstanding some implementation detail in TXT records or the RFC? > -- > Sadiq Saif > Bastetrix LLC >

5 let, 3 měsíce

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
75
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

knot-dns-users