- knot-dns-users - lists.nic.cz

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.9! It's a maintenance version with some fixes and improvements. Please note that 3.2.0 will be released in two weeks and 3.0 will no longer be officially supported. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.9/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

2 roky, 10 měsíců

1
0
0 0

db.storage

by Thomas

Hi, my knot installation (3.0.5) gives me this notice: notice: config, non-default 'template[default].storage' detected, please configure also 'db.storage' to avoid compatibility issues with future versions I have searched the docs to find out what I have to do, but did not find any specific information. Can you give me a hint what needs to be done here? Thanks a lot, Thomas

2 roky, 11 měsíců

2
1
0 0

keymgr del-all-old not only for offline KSK?

by Jan-Piet Mens

The documentation for `keymgr' says that the subcommand `del-all-old' is related to offline KSK, but it also seems to work for online KSK. Moments ago I had the following keys of which e381* had just been marked as removed: $ keymgr -c knot.conf tm list -b iso e381198aea254a1dbceb3c5b153cbefaa98c959a 31943 KSK ECDSAP256SHA256 publish=2022-05-12T11:43:56Z ready=2022-05-12T11:43:56Z active=2022-05-12T11:43:56Z retire=2022-05-12T12:35:42Z revoke=2022-05-12T12:33:42Z remove=2022-05-12T12:37:42Z d68e6803daa3e3ee34dd07d6966df0c402594fb2 26288 ZSK ECDSAP256SHA256 publish=2022-05-12T12:28:18Z active=2022-05-12T12:28:18Z b0cc879e9b9f5faae647c7019a12821e62150378 62610 KSK ECDSAP256SHA256 publish=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z ready=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z active=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z $ keymgr -c knot.conf tm del-all-old OK $ keymgr -c knot.conf tm list -b iso d68e6803daa3e3ee34dd07d6966df0c402594fb2 26288 ZSK ECDSAP256SHA256 publish=2022-05-12T12:28:18Z active=2022-05-12T12:28:18Z b0cc879e9b9f5faae647c7019a12821e62150378 62610 KSK ECDSAP256SHA256 publish=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z ready=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z active=2022-05-12T12:30:49Z and the PEM key file has also been removed. Is this to be expected? Would it be a good idea to add a note to the documentation clarifying this? Best regards, -JP

3 roky, 1 měsíc

2
2
0 0

manual KSK and automatic ZSK rollovers

by Jan-Piet Mens

Hello, I'd like to be able to do automatic ZSK and manual KSK rollovers. Basically the KSK should have an endless validity but I might want to roll it with (manually-trigerred) RFC 5011 semantics. It it permissible to have a policy such as shown below and then explicitly use `keymgr' commands to generate new keys and set `revoke', `retire' and `remove' timers on the older key? Testing indicates that it works as desired, I'm just unsure whether key manipulation is permitted. policy: - id: autoHSM keystore: pemstore single-type-signing: off manual: off ksk-shared: off ksk-lifetime: 0 zsk-lifetime: 30d cds-cdnskey-publish: rollover Thank you, -JP

3 roky, 1 měsíc

2
2
0 0

keymgr: list output in JSON?

by Jan-Piet Mens

Hello, keymgr(8) lists keys in plain text which is fine for processing with awk(1) et.al. Are there any plans to make it output JSON? I'm thinking along the lines of making parsing future-proof: [ { "id": "a982d72174a48a3ef083a97e5aae02cc47f58762", "ksk": true, "zsk": false, "key_tag": 61676, "algo": 8, "size": 2048, "public-only": false, "pre-active": 0, "publish": 1652161461, "ready": 1652161581, "active": 1652161642, "retire-active": 1652168902, "retire": 0, "post-active": 0, "revoke": 0, "remove": 1652168962 } ] keymgr_list_keys() calls either of print_key_full() / print_key_brief() to do the work, and I think it would be quite easy to add support for JSON. Is this something I should make happen? -JP

3 roky, 1 měsíc

2
2
0 0

Importing KSK/ZSK from HSM/PKCS#11 and rolling thereafter

by Jan-Piet Mens

Hello, I need to migrate away from an HSM-backed OpenDNSSEC installation which uses a Thales nCipher for key storage and am experimenting with Knot DNS 3.1.8 (on CentOS 7, FWIW). I've compiled Knot, and it is able to access said HSM via PKCS#11. I have configured a zone with a manual policy. policy: - id: manualHSM keystore: thales single-type-signing: on manual: on After importing keys from the HSM with `keymgr import-kcs11', knotd launches and signs the zone with KSK/ZSK as expected. What I would then like to have happen is to have periodic ZSK rollovers as well as periodic KSK rollovers. In order to accomplish this I have changed the zone's policy to policy: - id: autoHSM keystore: thales single-type-signing: off manual: off algorithm: rsasha256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 1024 zone-max-ttl: 60 dnskey-ttl: 60 propagation-delay: 60 nsec3: on nsec3-iterations: 0 nsec3-salt-length: 0 nsec3-salt-lifetime: 0 ksk-lifetime: 7200 zsk-lifetime: 3600 A restart of knotd then begins by creating a new ZSK and rolling it, and the KSK is rolled automatically after 7200 seconds. (These timers are for testing only.) So far no complaints whatsoever -- this is working exactly as I had hoped it would. I am assuming that it is permissible to change a zone's policy in flight. What I'd like is confirmation that the KSK roll will actually never occur immediately, but only after a first period has elapsed. Can I rely on this behavior, i.e. that the first KSK roll will occur only after a first `ksk-lifetime' period? Best regards, -JP

3 roky, 1 měsíc

2
1
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.8 and 3.0.11 releases

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.8 and 3.0.11! Both versions fix quite a serious bug in the TSIG processing when the server can crash if the TSIG is malformed. If you don't use TSIG, you are not affected. Special thanks go to 0x34d for finding this bug! In addition to some other fixes, the 3.1.8 version introduces a new automatic ACL mode that can help simplify complex configurations. This mode is disabled by default! Changelogs: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.8/NEWS https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.11/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 1 měsíc

1
0
0 0

public-only key makes DNSSEC signing fail

by Thomas

Hi, for the transition of a TLD I need to import the current providers KSK into my zone. I use the "keymgr import-pub" command for this. I have done that a few times in the past and it worked very well. I have now installed the most current version of Knot (3.0.10) and did the same procedure. But after importing the KSK the zone can't be signed anymore. It seems like Knot doesn't recognize that this imported key is a "public-only" key. Knot throws an error and complains that the private key could not be loaded. The zone's keys (.example) before the import of the KSK: # keymgr example list 0b94a3f9fef3ae531fc5ee1334ddd2876db7cd9a ksk=yes zsk=no tag=12595 algorithm=7 size=2048 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1650495677 ready=1650495677 active=1650659051 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 13cc082655ddf7160787ef945ad7edb6406bb70e ksk=no zsk=yes tag=05477 algorithm=7 size=1024 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1650495677 ready=0 active=1650495677 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 Imported the KSK with the following command: # keymgr example import-pub /etc/knot/public.key 2c135e77b7f48475a837ad0d28a9459f0e7ce621 OK The zone's keys (.example) after the import of the KSK: # keymgr example list 0b94a3f9fef3ae531fc5ee1334ddd2876db7cd9a ksk=yes zsk=no tag=12595 algorithm=7 size=2048 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1650495677 ready=1650495677 active=1650659051 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 13cc082655ddf7160787ef945ad7edb6406bb70e ksk=no zsk=yes tag=05477 algorithm=7 size=1024 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1650495677 ready=0 active=1650495677 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 2c135e77b7f48475a837ad0d28a9459f0e7ce621 ksk=yes zsk=no tag=35421 algorithm=7 size=2048 public-only=yes pre-active=0 publish=1650660072 ready=0 active=0 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 The imported key (tag 35421) has the flag "public-only=yes", as expected. But when I now sign the zone, the log shows this errors: Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] control, received command 'zone-sign' Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] DNSSEC, dropping previous signatures, re-signing zone Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] DNSSEC, key, tag 12595, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, KSK, public, active Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] DNSSEC, key, tag 35421, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, KSK, public, active+ Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] DNSSEC, key, tag 5477, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, public, active Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: error: [example.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: error: [example.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: info: [example.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2022-04-22T21:43:24+0000 Apr 22 20:43:24 lab-nic knotd[2831]: error: [example.] zone event 'DNSSEC re-sign' failed (not exists) The imported key should not have the "active" flag: info: [example.] DNSSEC, key, tag 35421, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, KSK, public, active+ It seems to me that the imported key is not seen as a "public-only" key anymore and therefore Knot is looking for the corresponding private key, which of course fails. I attached an strace output, with the signing operation. But that doesn't seem to be helpful because the signing command itself doesn't fail. Thanks, Thomas

3 roky, 1 měsíc

3
4
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.7 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.7! This version primarily fixes incomplete implementation of the Offline KSK signing mode in the IXFR and DDNS processing. Please note that the online signing still doesn't support Offline KSK! Also various fixes and improvements regarding catalog zones are included. Our donation page newly accepts EUR and USD: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.7/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 2 měsíce

1
0
0 0

'remote' semantics

by Matthew Pounsett

Just to clarify some semantics of the config format. Is each individual 'remote' ID considered to be a single server, regardless of the number of addresses it has? For the notify case, it looks like knot will send to each address in a remote ID in serial, and stop as soon as one replies. That suggests the above semantics, but I wanted to make sure I'm interpreting this behaviour correctly before I complicate my config by adding a lot more remotes. I am currently treating each remote as an organisation, lumping all of that organisation's servers together under a single ID.

3 roky, 3 měsíce

5
5
0 0

Monitoring for "waiting for DS submission"

by Matthew Pounsett

I'm trying to find a way to poll for any zones where knot is currently waiting on DS submission to the parent. I'm aware of the structured logging sent to systemd-journald but I see this as not particularly useful for monitoring, as the event could be missed by a dead daemon, bug in code, etc. I'd much prefer to be able to actively monitor states by polling. It looks like the only way I can do that right now is to run `keymgr list` and analyze the output. If I'm reading the documentation correctly, all I need to look for is a key that is `ksk=yes`, `ready != 0`, and `active = 0`. Does that seem correct? Am I missing something simpler? :)

3 roky, 3 měsíce

5
5
0 0

Algorithm roll enhancement

by Matthew Pounsett

I have found a situation where I think the Knot behaviour around algorithm rolls could be better. It's one of those "prevent the user from hurting themselves" situations, in which I would have hurt myself if this had involved anything other than an old, unused zone. :) The suggestion is a simple one: when doing an automated algorithm roll, the KSK submission check should remain negative until the parental DS set exactly matches the set requested by the published CDS set (substitute DNSKEY/CDNSKEY as appropriate). In a situation where CDS scanning is not being done by my parent, I slipped up and only added the new DS record to the parent, leaving the old algorithm's DS record also present. Knot did its submission check, saw the new DS record, and happily continued on with the algorithm roll. This eventually led to a situation that was in violation of RFC 6840 § 5.11 [0]: A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone. I ended up with a situation where I had the new and old DS, but only the new DNSKEY [1]. This seems like a situation that could be avoided by extending the logic of the KSK submission check. In addition to saving users from themselves, it would also help if a situation occurred where the parent had a bug in their CDS processing implementation and failed to remove the old DS. [0]: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6840#section-5.11> [1]: <https://dnsviz.net/d/dns-oarc.org/Yg7ZDw/dnssec/>

3 roky, 3 měsíce

2
2
0 0

Start Warnings

by Günther J. Niederwimmer

Hello, what is wrong in my policy section? I can't found any in the docs ? Have I missing Parameters or .............. The Warning is, Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: warning: config, policy[rsa2k].nsec3- iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: warning: config, policy[ececc1].nsec3- iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: 2022-02-13T12:33:05+0100 warning: config, policy[rsa2k].nsec3-iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: 2022-02-13T12:33:05+0100 warning: config, policy[ececc1].nsec3-iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: 2022-02-13T12:33:05+0100 warning: config, policy[ececc2].nsec3-iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 Feb 13 12:33:05 dns1 knotd[184636]: warning: config, policy[ececc2].nsec3- iterations defaults to 10, since version 3.2 the default becomes 0 my policy, policy: - id: rsa2k algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 4096 zsk-size: 2048 nsec3: on - id: ececc1 algorithm: ECDSAP256SHA256 nsec3: on - id: ececc2 algorithm: ecdsap384sha384 nsec3: on -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Günther J. Niederwimmer

3 roky, 4 měsíce

2
1
0 0

Memory usage sky rockets

by Einar Bjarni Halldórsson

Hi, I've got a staging environment running, with two signers signing a staging version of the .is zone (~115k records). The staging servers are configured with 2 GB RAM and 4 CPU cores, running on FreeBSD 12.2. We've experienced that knot crashes because the server runs out of memory. The zone is configured with: zonefile-sync: -1 zonefile-load: difference-no-serial journal-content: all One of the signers, after an hour of running is showing 215 MB resident memory used. The other signer, that's been running for a whole day is showing 1582 MB resident memory. I attached a screenshot showing the amount of memory used over a period of time, and the graph shows that the amount of memory used very suddenly increases. I assume the servers are using a lot of memory for the journals, but I'd like to understand why the sudden increase in used memory, and what to expect about needed memory? .einar

3 roky, 4 měsíce

3
3
0 0

DNS cookie not configured correctly?

by J. Echter

Hi, i have knot dns setup with dns cookie module enabled but if i check with dnsviz.net i always get: The server appears to support DNS cookies but did not return a COOKIE option. Relevant parts of my knot.conf: template: - id: default storage: "/var/lib/knot" dnssec-signing: on dnssec-policy: rsa2048 global-module: [ "mod-cookies", "mod-rrl/default" ] mod-rrl: - id: default rate-limit: 200 slip: 2 - domain: mydomain.de file: "/etc/knot/zones/mydomain.de.zone" notify: secondary acl: acl_secondary zonefile-load: difference I thought about maybe it's the slip: 2, but that didn't change anything if set to 1 Do you guys see anything obvious causing this "issue"? Thanks for your time Juergen

3 roky, 4 měsíce

5
9
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.6 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.6! It's mostly a maintenance version with some new features for those who need them. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.6/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 4 měsíce

1
0
0 0

zonefile-sync and strange SOA serial

by Einar Bjarni Halldórsson

Hi, For many months now, we've been preparing new signers for our internal zones and eventually .is. We've got the first of our test zones live on the production signers, but some things are troubling us. This is the config we're using for zones: template: - id: default semantic-checks: on storage: "/usr/local/etc/knot" file: "zones/unsigned/%s/%s-soa" serial-policy: dateserial zonefile-sync: -1 zonefile-load: difference-no-serial journal-content: all notify: hidden_primary acl: hidden_primary_acl policy: - id: isnic algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 4096 zsk-size: 2048 ksk-lifetime: 365d zsk-lifetime: 30d propagation-delay: 1h rrsig-lifetime: 14d rrsig-refresh: 7d rrsig-pre-refresh: 1h --- zones/unsigned is stored in a git repo and changes are deployed by an ansible playbook that checks out the latest revision and reloads the zones. Someone pointed out that zonefile-load: difference-no-serial was risky for something as important as a TLD, but what is the alternative when doing automatic DNSSEC signing on zone data from git? Also, we turned off zonefile-sync, since our current deployment script overwrites the zonefile. Is there a way to load initial zone data from one file, but do zonefile-sync to another? We're seeing this in our logs: Jan 20 09:32:06 ht-signer01 knot[49715]: info: [pp.is.] zone file parsed, serial corrected 1970010100 -> 2022012000 Jan 20 09:32:06 ht-signer01 knot[49715]: info: [pp.is.] loaded, serial 2022011900 -> 2022012000 -> 2022011900, 3830 bytes Any idea what's happening on the second line? It's like knot wants to increment the serial, but then changes it's mind :) .einar

3 roky, 4 měsíce

3
7
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.5 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.5! - This version brings some new features useful for operators of many zones and fixes a few bugs. - Our Docker images are newly build with some hardening flags set, enabled dnstap in kdig, and with fast zone parser enabled. - Please note that the expiration of the GPG key for our Debian repositories (https://deb.knot-dns.cz/apt.gpg) has been extended: ``` pub rsa4096/0x8A0EFB02C84B1E9B 2019-03-14 [SC] [expires: 2026-11-11] Key fingerprint = 8C0A 90B7 DE9C AC3B 4A7B D579 8A0E FB02 C84B 1E9B uid Knot DNS Packaging <knot-dns(a)labs.nic.cz> ``` Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.5/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 5 měsíců

1
0
0 0

RSASHA1 --> RSASHA256 question

by Chris

OK I recently decided to change the algorithm on all our domains from RSASHA1 to RSASHA256. Before making the change globally; I experimented with one domain. I did so by adding a new policy: CURRENT policy: - id: rsa1 algorithm: RSASHA1 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 1024 dnskey-ttl: 43200 zsk-lifetime: 30d ksk-lifetime: 365d NEW (PROPOSED) policy: - id: rsa2 algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 2048 dnskey-ttl: 43200 zsk-lifetime: 30d ksk-lifetime: 365d DOMAIN TESTED ON # a-domain - domain: a-domain file: "masters/a-domain" zonefile-load: difference dnssec-signing: on # dnssec-policy: rsa1 dnssec-policy: rsa2 semantic-checks: on serial-policy: dateserial acl: [locals, remotes01, remotes03, remotes04] To preform the intended change. I first set the the current keys on the test domain to: retire=+1hr I then added the new policy and assigned it to the testing domain. Then restarted the knot service. After the hour and some had passed. I performed a keymgr a-domain del-all-old which removed the old algorithm (RSASHA1) keys. But I think this was a mistake. How would I best make this change? Is it enough to simply change algorithm: and knot will just do the right thing? Thanks! -- Chris

3 roky, 6 měsíců

4
6
0 0

Migrate signed zone to knot

by Einar Bjarni Halldórsson

Hi, We're preparing to migrate our zones from OpenDNSSEC 1.4 to Knot DNS 3.1 (and eventually the .is zone). We've already migrated one unsigned zone to the new signers, but next on the list is first currently signed zone. We're going to migrate the zone by doing a key rollover, so we'll add DNSKEY records for the new keys to the zone on the old signer and vice versa. While we're migrating the zone we have to stop automatic key rollovers, and I planned to create a new policy 'dnssec_freeze' with `manual: on` and apply it to zones during migration. Am I correct that this will stop all automatic key rolloveres, but keep the signatures updated? The the migration is complete, DS records and delegations have been updated etc., I'll change the policy to an automatic policy. Will knot seamlessly start automatically rolling over keys according to the new policy? .einar

3 roky, 6 měsíců

3
4
0 0

Failure importing a public key from BIND

by Luveh Keraph

I am trying to import a public key generated by BIND into Knot, when using the SoftHSM2 key store. I have the following pieces of information: In my knot.conf file: policy: - id: SoftHSMRSAPolicy algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 2048 ksk-lifetime: 7h zsk-lifetime: 6h dnskey-ttl: 12s zone-max-ttl: 15s keystore: SoftHSM zone: - domain: 00.mydomain.com storage: /srv/knot file: db.mydomain00 dnssec-signing: on dnssec-policy: SoftHSMRSAPolicy The public key is in a file named pubkey, and has the following contents: ; This is a zone-signing key, keyid 14694, for 00.mydomain.com. ; Created: 20211109192137 (Tue Nov 9 12:21:37 2021) ; Publish: 20211109192137 (Tue Nov 9 12:21:37 2021) ; Activate: 20211109192137 (Tue Nov 9 12:21:37 2021) 00.mydomain.com. IN DNSKEY 256 3 8 AwEAAd1XmDMiF4/WWW+lneSg2hScxQl TJHU/cIyBnDJDnW3MFkuyR7e+y3UqZScTXz5tfcGkDYGpqFqZ3+RgyN7A3ZAC3RsayivUuE9lec25IT97 jPZaTsHUjalDQjXkBhCIHBb79vVsz0SMZOeez78qzhRtpdkFYVNRcAW4EZVgdQAdiuJGeDEuxsaTkRnLwujnaqURyAzevqfQfjz319CPsYr4tN4K9nu2Fc0Sh+b5pdM6ejRieLnUUgZpuefRfgsSHJQErNe FevdtihLpq93r E5OARwmK0c4vyzgpmREloMJlwV+lrZdlKqZnnIZIXgkD+59Tjh0XZ72exdvonun4uG8= (The DNSKEY record is in a single line.) The command I am using to import this key is # ./keymgr 00.mydomain.com. import-pub ./pubkey This spins for a few seconds and then prints out: Error: file error Any ideas as to what it is that I am doing wrong? The command that I am invoking to import this public key is the following:

3 roky, 7 měsíců

1
2
0 0

KSK rollover using alternate keystore

by Bastien Durel

Hello, Is there a way to perform a key rollover using a new keystore for the new KSK ? I'd like to switch from KASP DB pem files to HSM-backed keys I've tried to make a new zone test.test, using the default KASP, and then change the storage to HSM, but this leads to 'not exists' errors at reload : nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, key, tag 4164, algorithm ECDSAP384SHA384, KSK, public, ready, active+ nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, key, tag 15855, algorithm ECDSAP384SHA384, public, active nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:36:39+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:36:39+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:36:39+0100 error: [test.test.] zone event 'DNSSEC re-sign' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-11-09T12:36:39+0100 nov. 09 11:36:39 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] zone event 'DNSSEC re-sign' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:40 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:40 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:36:40+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:40 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:36:40+0100 error: [test.test.] zone event 'DS check' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:36:40 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] zone event 'DS check' failed (not exists) policy: - id: default algorithm: ECDSAP384SHA384 ksk-size: 384 zsk-size: 384 nsec3: on nsec3-salt-lifetime: 4d ksk-submission: validating-resolver - id: default_hsm keystore: hsmkey algorithm: ECDSAP384SHA384 ksk-size: 384 zsk-size: 384 nsec3: on nsec3-salt-lifetime: 4d ksk-submission: validating-resolver zone: - domain: "test.test." file: "test.test" # dnssec-policy: default dnssec-policy: default_hsm keymgr test.test list -> b63796b44dcfed7392639aec6fb4a7ca9ca446dd ksk=yes zsk=no tag=04164 algorithm=14 size=384 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1636454163 ready=1636454163 active=0 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 fdd7822a5498d6eda619092f01dffa41c285d00e ksk=no zsk=yes tag=15855 algorithm=14 size=384 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1636454163 ready=0 active=1636454163 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 knotc zone-key-rollover test.test ksk -> nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, key, tag 4164, algorithm ECDSAP384SHA384, KSK, public, ready, active+ nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, key, tag 15855, algorithm ECDSAP384SHA384, public, active nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, key, tag 43192, algorithm ECDSAP384SHA384, KSK, public, active+ nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:39:58+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:39:58+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: info: [test.test.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-11-09T12:39:51+0100 nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:39:58+0100 error: [test.test.] zone event 'DNSSEC re-sign' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] zone event 'DNSSEC re-sign' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:39:58+0100 error: [test.test.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: 2021-11-09T11:39:58+0100 error: [test.test.] zone event 'DS check' failed (not exists) nov. 09 11:39:58 arrakeen knotd[2144032]: error: [test.test.] zone event 'DS check' failed (not exists) keymgr test.test list -> b63796b44dcfed7392639aec6fb4a7ca9ca446dd ksk=yes zsk=no tag=04164 algorithm=14 size=384 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1636454163 ready=1636454163 active=0 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 fc4c2a4b6b43d0428a68b4e130232d261a5ee189 ksk=yes zsk=no tag=43192 algorithm=14 size=384 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1636454391 ready=0 active=0 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 fdd7822a5498d6eda619092f01dffa41c285d00e ksk=no zsk=yes tag=15855 algorithm=14 size=384 public-only=no pre-active=0 publish=1636454163 ready=0 active=1636454163 retire-active=0 retire=0 post-active=0 revoke=0 remove=0 The DNSKEY was not changed when the new ksk was introduced, so I guess it's not visible : dig +dnssec @ns.geekwu.org dnskey test.test test.test. 86400 IN DNSKEY 256 3 14 f06gYOe4uyphbGuBAWvDFnkQDY8+3SrM4e8k9o86AcuD3OL14chmn+34 np03/qFI5HCxG688v+Krnm8MbOc+eEaCBHisJpWo8j9+ot/ct2rfJln3 96rNcQXCzUNzDaSZ test.test. 86400 IN DNSKEY 257 3 14 7qUXsDfMWc8D6rp9Rvt2QOORZi7/pTEclBawadkauau3xA9iTBwOsZ0G 0/6/O9PqrdQBrHP2K4sODOLSI685sOz5lZGRaUqPkuiZe2Gj1OwXsUz1 495W+GmnoAz26YHh test.test. 86400 IN RRSIG DNSKEY 14 2 86400 20211123103603 20211109090603 4164 test.test. 79XNugNJVXJktk7EpIf+0JlJUGDRrxRtbqKQqZouY1vViLn2PY+SVxPd msnQl5EEX9Cp3dHvAw1xOTYjupnYHj5FlA14g9tRPxD97jRylrXgg0rW TLU4he2ujC1rhcS4 Is this kind of rollover/keystore switch supported ? Thanks, -- Bastien

3 roky, 7 měsíců

2
4
0 0

Data saved into the KASP

by Luveh Keraph

I have been trying to get a better understanding concerning the information Knot stores in its KASP. Knot adds new key information into the KASP by means of the kasp_db_add_key function. One of the arguments to this function is a pointer to a key_params_t structure, one of whose members is called is_pub_only. This would seem to imply that the KASP may contain information about key pairs such that only the public component of the key pair is available to Knot. Under what set of circumstances would such a key be stored in the KASP? Since they are used for signing RRs, any KSKs and ZSKs in the KASP have to be complete, in that both the private and the public components are available to Knot (I know that the private component itself is not present in the KASP, but that's OK). A KASP key for which the private component is not available could be used for verifying signatures - but that's not something that Knot does, right? So, under what set circumstances would Knot add a key to the KASP such that the is_pub_only member is set to true?

3 roky, 7 měsíců

2
2
0 0

dnsbenchmark issues

by Rhonda D'Vine

Hi, I'm trying to dig into the dns-benchmark tools, but am running into a few issues. I realized that it requires some specific settings, like /home/dnsbench seems to be hardcoded for the logs somehow, and it being run as root, but now I see a lot of syntax error message flooding me, with lines in between about that hostname is an invalid number: standard_in) 2: syntax error (standard_in) 2: syntax error (standard_in) 2: syntax error (standard_in) 2: syntax error (standard_in) 1: syntax error (standard_in) 1: syntax error (standard_in) 1: syntax error (standard_in) 1: syntax error (standard_in) 1: syntax error /tmp/benchmark-1636019360/modules/responses.sh: line 170: printf: hostname: invalid number knot2 ssh: % answered for Could q/s, not B avg (resolve a/s, 0 B avg) (repeated output) Anyone else using the tools and potentially can give me a prod in the right direction? We'd like to check how knot performs in our environment with the systems we have at hand. Thanks in advance for any advice, Rhonda

3 roky, 7 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.4 and 3.0.10 releases

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.4 and 3.0.10! These versions primarily fixes a very old bug which can cause the server to crash if a query requests EDNS0/NSID option. Special thanks go to Romain Labolle! Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.4/NEWS https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.10/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 7 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Setting up zone file MX record to external mail server

by Dirk Segers

Hi, we've had knot in use for years now and are still using version 1.6.7. I We've recently migrated e-mail to exchange online. I've been asked to update the MX record in the zone to point to mail.protection.outlook.com. I initially tried to simply replace the current value by mail.protection.outlook.com but then the name of the zone is added to the value. This is not a valid record. I see no way to update the MX record to this value. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance for the feedback. Kind regards, Dirk

3 roky, 7 měsíců

2
2
0 0

Changing DNS Operators for DNSSEC signed Zones

by Luveh Keraph

There is an Internet draft ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-chan…) that describes a mechanism to facilitate the operation consisting of changing the DNS delegation for a signed DNS zone. Since this is a draft, I do not expect for Knot to provide support for it already (in fact, I know it does not, for it involves signing a DNSKEY RR, which Knot does not do) but I wonder whether this is something that is in Knot's roadmap?

3 roky, 7 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.3 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.3! This is mostly a bugfix version. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.3/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 8 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Newbie Questions: how-to simultaneously DNSsec-sign a zone with two different algorithms

by Pirawat WATANAPONGSE

Dear Guru(s), If the following questions have already been asked, I do apologize and would very much appreciate the pointers to where I can read the answer(s). I am currently ‘running’ a DNSsec-signed zone using Alg-8 [RSA/SHA2-256]. However, I would very much like to DNSsec-sign and publish my zone with two different algorithms (say, Alg-8 [RSA/SHA2-256] + Alg-13 [ECDSA-P256/SHA2-256]) *simultaneously*, in case the client-validators out there cannot process one algorithm or the other (never mind that they both are the ‘MUST’ in RFC 8624). It also is an opportunity to train myself in case I need to ‘add’ the third one (say, Alg-15 [ED25519]) or ‘migrate’ to the Alg-13 + Alg-15 combination in the future. Background Information: 1. I have a ‘hidden server’ acting as ‘The Signer’. 2. ‘The Signer’ feeds the already-signed zone to the visible ‘Primary Server’. 3. The ‘Primary Server’, in turn, feeds all other ‘Secondary Servers’, some of which are not under my control. 4. Unfortunately, currently none of the above servers is a Knot, but I am switching The Signer to Knot. My questions are: 5. What will be the correct configuration for The Knot Signer? I don’t mind maintaining two completely separated ‘Signed Trees’ of the same zone, unless cross-signing (the keys) between algorithms is the best practice. 6. Will there be any special configuration for the ‘Primary/Secondary Servers’? If so, I will then need to inform admins of the servers outside my control. Thank you for any help you can offer, both on and off the mailing list. Gratefully, Pirawat. -- _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Assist.Prof. Pirawat WATANAPONGSE, Ph.D. _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Department of Computer Engineering _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Kasetsart University, Bangkhen (Main) Campus _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Bangkok 10900, THAILAND _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ eMail: Pirawat.W(a)ku.th or Pirawat.W(a)ku.ac.th _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Tel: +66 2 797 0999 extension 1417 _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ Fax: +66 2 579 6245 _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ http://www.cpe.ku.ac.th/~pw/

3 roky, 8 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Zone Transfers fail if server has multiple IPs

by Schindler, Stefan

Hi all My server recently gained two more IPv6 & IPv4 addresses. That broke my transfer setup because for some reason knot is not using the address it is binding to for the requests but some of the other ones. Can I configure that? Best, Stefan

3 roky, 8 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Fixing broken AXFR zone transfer with knot slave and dnsmasq as master

by Daniel Gröber

Hi knot-dns-users, I have knotd as a slave for a dnsmasq and I'm seeing fallback from IXFR to AXFR not working properly. TLDR: I have patches and while I'm waiting for my gitlab access to be allowed to submit MRs I wrote this email :) What happens is that the first AXFR goes through and everything looks happy dandy, but if I restart dnsmasq to force a SOA update knot tries to do an IXFR which fails and doesn't fall back to AXFR. First the AXFR works: knotd: info: [myzone.example.net.] AXFR, incoming, remote 2001:db8::2@53, started knotd: [myzone.example.net.] AXFR, incoming, remote 2001:db8::2@53, finished, 0.00 seconds, 1 messages, 870 bytes knotd: info: [myzone.example.net.] refresh, remote 2001:db8::2@53, zone updated, 0.00 seconds, serial none -> 1632501860 when I restart dnsmasq to force a SOA update, the following IXFR fails: knotd: info: [myzone.example.net.] refresh, remote 2001:db8::2@53, remote serial 1632503553, zone is outdated knotd: warning: [myzone.example.net.] IXFR, incoming, remote 2001:db8::2@53, malformed response SOA knotd: warning: [myzone.example.net.] refresh, remote myremote-dnsmasq not usable knotd: error: [myzone.example.net.] refresh, failed (no usable master) I've been sitting on this bug for a while now since I couldn't make heads or tails of what the code is doing but my third try at debugging this finally worked out. If we look at the fallback logic in src/knot/events/handlers/refresh.c, in try_refresh(), it revolves around this kind of gnarly while statement: // while loop runs 0x or 1x; IXFR to AXFR failover while (ret = knot_requestor_exec(&requestor, req, timeout), ret = (data.ret == KNOT_EOK ? ret : data.ret), ixfr_error_failover(ret) && data.xfr_type == XFR_TYPE_IXFR && data.state != STATE_SOA_QUERY) { If the while loop is taken fallback to AXFR happens otherwise not. Attaching gdb to my running knot I can see that in my failure case all conditionals except `data.xfr_type == _IXFR` are true but xfr_type is in fact not _IXFR but _ERROR. As far as I can tell the only reason for this check is to terminate the loop once the fallback to AXFR has happened as `_AXFR != _IXFR`. I shall elaborate on this below. So where does xfr_type become _ERROR? In my case determine_xfr_type() returns _ERROR due to the first check, `answer->count < 1` and ixfr_consume assigns this to xfr_type which in turn happens as part of the knot_requestor_exec() call in the while. So how does the fallback usually happen then? Well ixfr_consume checks the RCODE and fails immediately, without modifying xfr_type that is, if it's no good. That way the while statement will run the fallback code. // Check RCODE if (knot_pkt_ext_rcode(pkt) != KNOT_RCODE_NOERROR) { [...] return KNOT_STATE_FAIL; } I'm not really familliar with the DNS RFCs so I'm not sure if dnsmasq is supposed to repond with an error to unsupported query types but from some quick experiments against prominent authorative DNS servers around the internet it does seem like it's behaviour, reponding with NOERROR, an empty answer section and a SOA in authority is what everyone else does too when they get an rrtype they don't care for. Why now would the fallback logic not want to fallback to AXFR in this case? I can't think of a reason it would really want to do that. Like I said above it seems to me the only reason for the _IXFR check in the while is to make sure the loop terminates. Though IMO this is a very roundabout way of doing that and just using an if would be cleaner to boot. Anyway, let's do some git archeology on that point. The first related commit I can find is commit 39e447e4590c7d5fc12a5c05ed11a45fd6561dda Author: Libor Peltan <libcha.p(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed Oct 17 10:08:53 2018 +0200 ixfr/axfr: failover even when the ixfr reply wasn't valid before: ixfr falls back to axfr only if valid, but negative reply, e.g. NOTAUTH, journal inconsistency.. after: ixfr falls back to axfr in any case ixfr fails, e.g. malformed reply packet This is the commit that introduced the while statement for the fallback in try_refresh. It looked like so back then: // while loop runs 0x or 1x; IXFR to AXFR failover while ((ret = knot_requestor_exec(&requestor, req, timeout)) != KNOT_EOK && data.xfr_type == XFR_TYPE_IXFR) { Much simpler, if knot_requestor_exec returns a failure and xfr_type is _IXFR the fallback to AXFR happens. Now what I don't understand is that from the commit message this fix sounds just like my issue. Dnsmasq sends back what knot considers an invalid reply so why didn't this fix my problem too? Weird. Looking further I find commit 5c1a5e28797f9c2eab1300247c052451ccd3be3e Author: Libor Peltan <libor.peltan(a)nic.cz> Date: Tue Jan 31 18:07:28 2017 +0100 XFR: proper handling of single-SOA first response message which introduced determine_xfr_type and the XFR_TYPE_ERROR distinction. If I build the commit just before that one a8237b1f8 xfr: separated functions consuming one rrset of [ai]xfr response and setup a config to reproduce my setup, then XFR against dnsmasq actually starts to work. Back at 5c1a5e287 things are broken with the "malformed SOA" message again. So we likely found the culprit. Ok so back at the bad commit 5c1a5e287 // IXFR to AXFR failover - if (data->is_ixfr && next == KNOT_STATE_FAIL) { + if (data->xfr_type == XFR_TYPE_IXFR && next == KNOT_STATE_FAIL) { This is what introduced the `xfr_type == _IXFR` check which later got moved from this if statement in transfer_consume() to the while loop in try_refresh() by 39e447e45. The check used to be just for is_ixfr which got initialized in refresh_begin to start with (in the good commit 5c1a5e287~1): if (data->soa) { data->state = STATE_SOA_QUERY; data->is_ixfr = true; } else { in bad commit 5c1a5e287: if (data->soa) { data->state = STATE_SOA_QUERY; data->xfr_type = XFR_TYPE_IXFR; data->initial_soa_copy = NULL; } else { and then got reset to false by the fallback code. So I'm pretty convinced at this point that 5c1a5e287 just messed up that logic and the specificity of the XFR_TYPE_IXFR check really is unintended. To fix this we simply replace that check with a counter that ensures the loop will run at most twice like so: --- a/src/knot/events/handlers/refresh.c +++ b/src/knot/events/handlers/refresh.c @@ -1188,12 +1188,12 @@ static int try_refresh(conf_t *conf, zone_t *zone, const conf_remote_t *master, int timeout = conf->cache.srv_tcp_remote_io_timeout; - int ret; + int ret, i; // while loop runs 0x or 1x; IXFR to AXFR failover while (ret = knot_requestor_exec(&requestor, req, timeout), ret = (data.ret == KNOT_EOK ? ret : data.ret), - ixfr_error_failover(ret) && data.xfr_type == XFR_TYPE_IXFR && + ixfr_error_failover(ret) && i++ <= 1 && data.state != STATE_SOA_QUERY) { REFRESH_LOG(LOG_WARNING, data.zone->name, data.remote, "fallback to AXFR (%s)", knot_strerror(ret)); --- Thoughts? Am I missing something this check is doing? --Daniel

3 roky, 8 měsíců

3
2
0 0

expiring/renewing dnssec keys

by mj

Hi, We're new in the dnssec field, and we hope we understand the basics, also thanks to the much appreciated help received through this list and through searching it's archives, thanks again! We would like to ask two more short questions, but first a we will explain how we currently understand things. Our dns domain is sub.company.com, and we will activate DNSSEC somewhere next week, by doing: - enable dnssec for the zone / reverse zone in knot.conf - restart knot - display the generated dnssec keys, using: > keymgr sub.company.com dnskey > keymgr sub.company.com ds (plus the reverse) - send the outputs of the above to the admins at company.com - after they have entered the keys in their dns, the world can check & verify our dnssec, and things are operational. - verify everything at https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/ Now the two questions. We have set in knot.conf: zsk-lifetime: 30d ksk-lifetime: 365d We understand that with the above config, monthly zsk key rollovers happen automatically "inside" knot, but the yearly rollover (ksk) needs to be manually propagated by us to the parent dns. (through for example secured email to the admins at company.com) Question one: Is there some kind of notification mechanism in knot, that reminds us (through email for example) that a ksk is about to expire, and keys need to be renewed at company.com dns? I cannot find such a function. Does it not exist? Or do we misunderstand something? It seems to be so vital. Question two: How unreasonable/insecure would it be to take a longer ksk lifetime than one year, let's say 10 years. With the idea that we can always manually renew keys earlier, in case we need to. Feedback on the above is welcome. We have scheduled a maintenance moment next week with the admins on company.com to send them the keys and activate dnssec. Thanks in advance for any feedback/pointers you can provide. Best regards, MJ

3 roky, 8 měsíců

5
12
0 0

EdDSA support over PKCS #11

by Luveh Keraph

I notice that knot 3.1 does not support EdDSA (22519 and 448) when using softhsm as a PKCS #11 backend. Since this is supported by knot when using the default cryptographic provider, and also by gnutls 3.6.0 (at least for the 25519 version) for release 3.6.0 and later, my guess is that this a limitation in softhsm itself. Could anybody in this forum with the necessary savvy please confirm (or not) this?

3 roky, 8 měsíců

2
6
0 0

KNOT Resolver DNS over TLS Error

by Günther J. Niederwimmer

Hello List, I would like to install KNOT-resolver, first test it with DNS over TLS, but that doesn't work? My system is an oracle Linux 8.4 I have a Letsencrypt certificate for this system and wanted to integrate it into kresd, but I get a GNUTLS error? Sep 22 18:27:30 bbs kresd[446005]: [tls ] gnutls_certificate_set_x509_key_file(/etc/letsencrypt/live/bbs.xxxx.xxxx/ fullchain_ecdsa.pem,/etc/pki/private/xxxx.xxxx_ec.key) failed: -64 (GNUTLS_E_FILE_ERROR) Sep 22 18:27:30 bbs kresd[446005]: [system] error while loading config: error occurred here (config filename:lineno is at the bottom, if config is involved):#012stack traceback:#012#011[C]: in function 'tls'#012#011/etc/knot- resolver/kresd.conf:24: in main chunk#012ERROR: Invalid argument (workdir '/ var/lib/knot-resolver') Sep 22 18:27:30 bbs systemd[1]: kresd(a)1.serbice.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Does this not work with a Letsenkrypt certificate or I have another error in my configuration My config -- SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 -- vim:syntax=lua:set ts=4 sw=4: -- Refer to manual: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.org/en/stable/ -- Uncomment this only if you need to debug problems -- verbose(true) log_level('debug') -- Network interface configuration net.listen('127.0.0.1', 53, { kind = 'dns' }) net.listen('127.0.0.1', 853, { kind = 'tls' }) --net.listen('127.0.0.1', 443, { kind = 'doh2' }) net.listen('::1', 53, { kind = 'dns', freebind = true }) net.listen('::1', 853, { kind = 'tls', freebind = true }) --net.listen('::1', 443, { kind = 'doh2' }) net.listen('xxx.xxx.xxx.1', 53, { kind = 'dns' }) net.listen('xxx.xxx.xxx.1', 853, { kind = 'tls' }) net.listen('192.168.100.200', 53, { kind = 'dns' }) net.listen('192.168.100.200', 853, { kind = 'tls' }) net.listen('xxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxx::200', 53, { kind = 'dns' }) net.listen('xxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxx::200', 853, { kind = 'tls' }) -- DNS over TLS net.tls("/etc/letsencrypt/live/bbs.xxxx.xxx/fullchain_ecdsa.pem", "/etc/pki/ tls/private/xxxx.xxx_ec.key") -- Load useful modules modules = { 'hints > iterate', -- Load /etc/hosts and allow custom root hints 'stats', -- Track internal statistics 'predict', -- Prefetch expiring/frequent records } The whole thing happens when I start kresd with "systemctl start kresd @ 1"? when I start kresd -v on the command line I don't see any errors but I don't know if he is using the "/etc/knot-resolver/kresd.conf"? -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Günther J. Niederwimmer

3 roky, 8 měsíců

3
3
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.9 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.9! This version only backports some fixes from the 3.1 branch. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.9/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 9 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Old keys management

by Luveh Keraph

When Knot generates a key pair, it will save it in some directory in the filesystem - in the clear, when using the default cryptographic provider, or as an encrypted blob when using SoftHSM, or (possibly) a real HSM. Imagine that I have a setup with many zones, with a signing policy that causes them to be re-signed often - say, every hour or so. This implies that new key pairs will be generated all the time. My question is, how does Knot manage key pairs that it does not need any more? It does not seem to remove them automatically. Does it provide any mechanisms or tools to do so?

3 roky, 9 měsíců

3
3
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.2 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.2! I would highlight new fancy keymgr mode `keymgr -b <zone> list [human | iso]` :-) Knot DNS 3.0.9 will follow soon. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.2/NEWS Migration: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.1/html/migration.html#upgrade-3-0-x-to-3-1-x Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 9 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Key pre-generation

by Luveh Keraph

I have been looking into the key pre-generation capability of keymgr, and the following question has come up: Imagine I pre-generate, say, one month's worth of keys for a given zone. This zone is defined so that it will be signed automatically on bringing up the Knot server. Next I start the Knot server. What criteria are used in order to select the keys, among the pre-generated ones, to be used to sign this zone? The reason I am asking is because I pre-generated two years worth of keys for a particular zone, and when I started the Knot server it took a significant amount of time selecting the appropriate keys from among the pre-generated ones.

3 roky, 10 měsíců

2
4
0 0

Knot and OpenSC "use_file_caching" - possible ?

by Laura Smith

I am working on a Knot deployment that uses Nitrokey HSM[1] as a PKCS11 platform. As you might imagine, for a small USB device, the Nitrokey is not exactly the most performant HSM in the world. My configuration works great with one or two test zones. But when I start ramping up the number of zones, I start seeing weird problems with Knot (e.g. " blocked zone update due to open control transaction" errors ... which don't seem to be errors because my code debug shows the "zone-commit" being run, but it still leaves the Knot database in a weird corrupt state where I cannot even "conf-unset" a domain even if it is clearly existing in "conf-read"). Looking around the internet, it seems "OpenSC use_file_caching " might be the answer[2]. Does Knot support this ? [1] https://www.nitrokey.com/files/doc/Nitrokey_HSM_factsheet.pdf [2]https://support.nitrokey.com/t/slow-initialization-of-nitrokey-hsm/2906/6

3 roky, 10 měsíců

3
6
0 0

Problem with local Domains example.com.lan

by Günther J. Niederwimmer

Hello list, I am a newbie I have a problem with KNOT or I don't understand Knot? What do I have to configure so that knot also dissolves my internal zones? My config for the zones # Internal zone - domain: 4gjn.com.lan # notify: secondary file: "/var/lib/knot/zones/4gjn.com.lan.zone" dnssec-signing: off zonefile-sync: -1 zonefile-load: difference journal-content: changes # master: primary1 # acl: update_acl # Master zone - domain: 100.168.192.in-addr.arpa # notify: secondary file: "/var/lib/knot/zones/100.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone" zonefile-sync: -1 zonefile-load: difference journal-content: changes dnssec-signing: off # master: primary # acl: acl_secondary with khost I have this answer on the knot-server khost 192.168.100.204 204.100.168.192.in-addr.arpa. points to ipa.4gjn.com.lan. khost ipa.4gjn.com.lan ipa.4gjn.com.lan. has IPv4 address 192.168.100.204 But with host do I get the answer back? host 192.168.100.204 Host 204.100.168.192.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3 (NXDOMAIN) host ipa.4gjn.com.lan Host ipa.4gjn.com.lan not found: 3 (NXDOMAIN) is that correct or do I have an error? ping seems to work ping ipa.4gjn.com.lan PING ipa.4gjn.com.lan (192.168.100.204) 56 (84) bytes of data. Thanks for an answer, -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Günther J. Niederwimmer

3 roky, 10 měsíců

2
4
0 0

knotc zone-backup : error: (operation not permitted)

by Laura Smith

Any ideas what might be causing the following error ? knotc (Knot DNS), version 3.1.0 $ sudo /usr/sbin/knotc zone-backup -- +backupdir /home/foo/test error: (operation not permitted) The destination directory exits. It doesn't matter if I run the command as root or knot user, the error is the same.

3 roky, 10 měsíců

4
9
0 0

Backing up keys

by Luveh Keraph

According to the documentation, one can back up the KASP using the mdb_dump command. Now I understand things correctly, this will just back up the public component of key pairs, plus some metadata for the zones the public keys are associated with. Are there any provisions in Knot concerning the backing up of the private components of key pairs, or is this something that must be done separately and within the context of whatever cryptographic provider is used?

3 roky, 10 měsíců

3
5
0 0

Question about keymgr

by Luveh Keraph

The documentation for keymgr describes the import-bind command as follows: import-bind BIND_key_file Imports a BIND-style key into KASP database (converting it to PEM format). Takes one argument: path to BIND key file (private or public, but both MUST exist). What is imported into the KASP exactly? I thought that the KASP database consisted of public keys alone. This aside, importing a private key will depend on whether the cryptographic provider supports such an operation - many HSMs, in particular those with stringent FIPS 140-compliance requirements, will in general refuse to do so. So, what does this command do with the private key? Is it turned over to the cryptographic provider, returning an error if this provider refuses to import private keys? If such is the case, is the public key still imported into the KASP, even though there will be no matching private key for it anywhere in the system? One can of course use a public key without a matching private key, but in a DNSSEC software framework like Knot, where the bulk of the activity consists of carrying out signing operations, the presence of a complete key pair would seem to be essential.

3 roky, 10 měsíců

2
2
0 0

knotc conf-set - (invalid item)

by Laura Smith

Hi, For various reasons I need to write a Go wrapper around knotc conf. The problem is I am seeing weird behaviour (the below is stdout from my Go script): ######## Command being run: /usr/sbin/knotc conf-begin OK Command being run: /usr/sbin/knotc conf-set 'server.version' '299'error: (invalid item) 'server.version' = '299' Command being run: /usr/sbin/knotc conf-abortOK ######## If I take the "usr/sbin/knotc conf-set 'server.version' '299'" string generated by Go and paste it onto CLI, it returns OK ? I have tried adding "-v" flag but that does not produce any interesting output. Any idea where I might be going wrong here ? Why am I getting "error: (invalid item)" when Go executes the command, but not when I run it manually ? Thanks !

3 roky, 10 měsíců

2
2
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.1 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.1! This version fixes several bugs and reverts one recent change in libzscanner. It emerged that the previous implementation of how omitted TTL is interpreted is closer to what the users expect. I'm sorry for this confusion! Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.1/NEWS Migration: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.1/html/migration.html#upgrade-3-0-x-to-3-1-x Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 10 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Question about key generation with keymgr

by Luveh Keraph

Tha man page for keymgr says that the keymgr generate command (quote) Generates new DNSSEC key and stores it in KASP database. (unquote) What is exactly stored in the KASP database? The reason I am asking is because the actual cryptographic key will be available in the clear only when using the default key store. When using an HSM (or event softhsm) only the HSM will have access to the key in the clear. So, what is it that gets stored in the KASP database when an HSM is used for generating keys?

3 roky, 10 měsíců

2
3
0 0

migrating from bind to knot

by mj

Hi, We are testing migration from bind to knot, to implement dnssec. We like many things about knot! Thank you for making it available! So far many things work, but we do have some uncertainties. Hope they're not too basic to ask here... We are using ubuntu, knot 3.1.0, our static bind zone files saved as /var/lib/knot/zones/db.domain.com and also the non-binary knot config. (in /etc/knot/knot.conf) 1) I wanted to test the knotc zone-backup command, but we're getting: > error: backup init failed (operation not permitted) Is the zone-backup command geared towards binary zones? Are our static zone files the reason this doesn't work? I realise we can simply copy the zone files, so in our case, the backup command probably adds nothing. 2) I have enabled DNSSEC, and upon restart we saw the keys being generated, and files appeared under /var/lib/knot/keys I guess keeping copies of the files there is adequate backup too? No "knotc zone-backup" required here as well? 3) After each knot restart, we are seeing: > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa.] DNSSEC, zone is up-to-date > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa.] loaded, serial none -> 2017041004, 106139 bytes > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-08-09T16:10:10+0200 > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [domain.com.] DNSSEC, zone is up-to-date > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [domain.com.] loaded, serial none -> 2021072903, 183151 bytes > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: info: [domain.com.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-08-09T16:10:10+0200 > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: warning: [domain.com.] failed to update zone file (operation not permitted) > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: error: [domain.com.] zone event 'journal flush' failed (operation not permitted) > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: warning: [1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa.] failed to update zone file (operation not permitted) > Aug 2 16:44:56 Latitude-E7470 knotd[259063]: error: [1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa.] zone event 'journal flush' failed (operation not permitted) We would like to understand the warnings/errors here too. Why would knot try to update the zone files, and why it is failing? I have set the permissions on the zone files 660 / knot:knot so it should be able edit them. (but again: why would knot want to update them?) Thanks for any feedback! MJ

3 roky, 10 měsíců

5
14
0 0

Enabling RSA2k and ED25519 at the same time

by Schindler, Stefan

Hi all I am currently running these two policies: ``` policy: - id: edecc algorithm: ed25519 nsec3: on - id: rsa algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 2048 nsec3: on ``` I tried enabling both with this command, but to no effect: ``` dnssec-policy: [ edecc, rsa ] ``` Is there a way to do both at the same time in one zone? I am currently running knot 3.0.8 Cheers, Stefan

3 roky, 10 měsíců

3
6
0 0

Knot DNS 3.1.0 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.1.0! This major version brings lots of new features and improvements. Please, check the changelog. As usual, today Knot DNS 2.9 reached its End-of-life. The official repositories are being updated this way: current stable -> 3.1.0, previous stable -> 3.0.8. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.1.0/NEWS Benchmarks: https://www.knot-dns.cz/benchmark/ Migration: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.1/html/migration.html#upgrade-3-0-x-to-3-1-x Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/ Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 10 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.8 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.8! This version primarily fixes one bug in KSK rollover when the old key is removed early if automatic KSK submission is enabled and DNSKEY TTL is lower than the corresponding DS TTL in the parent zone. Affected versions are 3.0.6 and 3.0.7. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.8/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

3 roky, 11 měsíců

1
0
0 0

trying to setup knot dns for my personal domain - server doesn't get accepted by my hoster

by J. Echter

Hi, i'm trying to setup a knot dns server for my personal domain. The servers are running and synchronizing between master and slave, but i cannot figure out why they do not get accepted by my domain hoster. I do get a 'Parameter value range error' response from them, so i figure it may be my configuration which is not right. I'm no pro in this stuff but i'm curious how it works, so if you don't mind i'll post it here and maybe someone has a thought what could be going on. Or maybe has some additional test i can run. I also checked them with nast from denic: https://www.denic.de/en/service/tools/nast/ (Nameserver Predelegation Check) Which doesn't complain, if i enter ns1.mydomain.de/ns2.domain.de and ipv4 / ipv6 ip's and click 'execute check'. I also checked with dig for response: dig @ns1.mydomain.de mydomain.de soa ;; BADCOOKIE, retrying. ; <<>> DiG 9.16.18 <<>> @ns1.mydomain.de mydomain.de soa ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 1174 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 ; COOKIE: 270b9518832d67270100000060d6d65c1844d3479cc64453 (good) ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mydomain.de. IN SOA ;; ANSWER SECTION: mydomain.de. 86400 IN SOA ns1.mydomain.de. dnsadmin.mydomain.de. 2021062526 14400 1800 2419200 900 ;; Query time: 63 msec ;; SERVER: aa.bb.cc.dd.ee#53(aa.bb.cc.dd) ;; WHEN: Sa Jun 26 09:25:16 CEST 2021 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 119 and here is my config: server: identity: ns1.mydomain.de nsid: ns1.mydomain.de rundir: "/run/knot" user: knot:knot listen: [ aa.bb.cc.dd.ee@53, aa:bb:cc:dd@53 ] mod-rrl: - id: default rate-limit: 200 slip: 2 log: - target: syslog any: info policy: - id: rsa2k algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 4096 zsk-size: 2048 nsec3: on - id: ececc algorithm: ecdsap384sha384 nsec3: on template: - id: default storage: "/var/lib/knot" dnssec-signing: on dnssec-policy: rsa2k global-module: mod-cookies global-module: mod-rrl/default database: storage: "/var/lib/knot" key: - id: dnsmaster algorithm: hmac-sha512 secret: secret - id: dnsslave algorithm: hmac-sha512 secret: secret remote: - id: secondary address: ee.ff.gg.hh@53 key: dnsslave acl: - id: acl_secondary address: ee.ff.gg.hh key: dnsmaster action: transfer zone: - domain: mydomain.de file: "/etc/knot/zones/mydomain.de.zone" notify: secondary acl: acl_secondary zonefile-load: difference and my zone file (without the keys and stuff added from knotd): ;; Zone dump (Knot DNS 3.0.7) mydomain.de. 86400 SOA ns1.mydomain.de. dnsadmin.mydomain.de. 2021062526 14400 1800 2419200 900 mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "v=spf1 ip4:aa.bb.cc.dd -all" mydomain.de. 86400 NS ns1.mydomain.de. mydomain.de. 86400 NS ns2.mydomain.de. mydomain.de. 86400 MX 10 mail.mydomain.de. _dmarc.mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:postmaster@mydomain.de; pct=100; fo=0:d:s; aspf=r; adkim=r;" _token._dnswl.mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "somestuff" 2020._domainkey.mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "v=DKIM1;k=rsa;p=alongline" _mta-sts.mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "v=STSv1; id=20210519103000Z;" _smtp._tls.mydomain.de. 86400 TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:postmaster@mydomain.de" autoconfig.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd autoconfig.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd test.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA ee:ff:gg:hh test.mydomain.de. 86400 A ee.ff.gg.hh imap.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd imap.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd mail.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd mail.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd mta-sts.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd mta-sts.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd ns1.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd ns1.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd ns2.mydomain.de. 86400 A ee.ff.gg.hh ns2.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA ee:ff:gg:hh smtp.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd smtp.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd wiki.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd wiki.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd www.mydomain.de. 86400 AAAA aa:bb:cc:dd www.mydomain.de. 86400 A aa.bb.cc.dd thanks for listening! juergen

3 roky, 11 měsíců

3
2
0 0

Config Problems

by Günther J. Niederwimmer

Hello List, I like to change to knot but ..........;-) Can any help Please? 1. My config is working with the Master Domains but I have a problem to configure to allow update "AXFER" TO my SLAVE servers ? What is the way to allow this. 2. I have a internal zone "examle.com.lan" this is loading, but I have to configure a PTR Zone this is not working, have any a example to configure this out. also a in-addr-arpa zonen? 3. the same Problem I have with ip6-arpa, what is the way to configure my hurican Net reverse zone with my old server bind this is all working, but I like to change :-) for all Help / answers all thanks -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Günther J. Niederwimmer

3 roky, 11 měsíců

2
3
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.7 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.7! This version fixes various bugs and introduces a few requested features. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.7/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky

1
0
0 0

Knot as Multi-Signer DNSSEC server with automatic key management

by Kadziolka, Marian

Hi, are there any plans to implement some multi-singner/multi-master dnsssec capabilities/solution? As far as i understand, there is no possibility to run two or more Knot servers with automatic key management [1] where all the servers use the same dnssec keys. Manual key management [2] can be used, but all the dnssec key automation of Knot will be lost. KASP DB sharing [3] or active and backup signer [4] is not a real multi-master solution. Some ideas: * Multi-Signer DNSSEC Models * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8901 * DNSSEC automation * https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-wisser-dnssec-automation-00.html Or do you have any ideas/recommendations how to create multi-master dnssec setup and keep automatic key management [1]? Thanks Marian [1] https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html/configuration.html#dnssec-automatic-z… [2] https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html/configuration.html#dnssec-manual-key-… [3] https://lists.nic.cz/pipermail/knot-dns-users/2019-November/001716.html [4] https://lists.nic.cz/pipermail/knot-dns-users/2020-December/001943.html Je dobré vědět, že tento e-mail a přílohy jsou důvěrné. Pokud spolu jednáme o uzavření obchodu, vyhrazujeme si právo naše jednání kdykoli ukončit. Pro fanoušky právní mluvy - vylučujeme tím ustanovení občanského zákoníku o předsmluvní odpovědnosti. Pravidla o tom, kdo u nás a jak vystupuje za společnost a kdo může co a jak podepsat naleznete zde<https://onas.seznam.cz/cz/podpisovy-rad-cz.html> You should know that this e-mail and its attachments are confidential. If we are negotiating on the conclusion of a transaction, we reserve the right to terminate the negotiations at any time. For fans of legalese—we hereby exclude the provisions of the Civil Code on pre-contractual liability. The rules about who and how may act for the company and what are the signing procedures can be found here<https://onas.seznam.cz/cz/podpisovy-rad-cz.html>.

4 roky

2
1
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.6 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.6! This version fixes KSK rollover, zone file load with HTTPS/SVCB records, zone backup/restore, and more. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.6/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 1 měsíc

1
0
0 0

Re: [knot-dns-users] keymgr and keystores

by Full Name

Thanks. You are right - once the keymgr operation is launched on a zone that is defined in knot.conf so that the SoftHSM policy applies to it, the keys involved are managed by the softhsm module. I have verified that such is the case for keymgr when using the generate command, and it stands to reason that the same would apply to other commands supported by keymgr. I haven't tried modifying the template section, as you suggest, but I am sure it works as expected. This all also explains and justifies why an option to specify a keystore for keymgr to work with, present in older versions, has been removed - it is not necessary. Thanks for your help/ -----Original Message----- From: "Daniel Salzman" [daniel.salzman(a)nic.cz] Date: 05/03/2021 01:57 AM To: "Full Name" <nuncestbibendum(a)excite.com>, knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] keymgr and keystores If you don't specify any configuration or kaspdb explicitly, keymgr uses default Knot configuration (file or database). So the problem probably is that you are generating keys for zones with default dnssec policy, which doesn't use the softhsm keystore. Try setting: template: - id: default ... dnssec-policy: RSAPol On 5/2/21 3:46 PM, Full Name wrote: > Thanks for your reply. Please see my comments below. > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Daniel Salzman" [daniel.salzman(a)nic.cz] > Date: 05/02/2021 04:51 AM > To: knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz > Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] keymgr and keystores > > > On 4/30/21 7:47 PM, Full Name wrote: >> I am evaluating version 2.9.5 of Knot, in particular in what concerns key management. This examination has resulted in the following issues/questions, which I would like to bring up to this forum for discussion/clarification: >> >> 1. I have been testing with the default Knot out-of-the-box setup, with the following knot.conf file: >> >> server: >> listen: [10.0.0.1 ] >> >> log: >> - target: syslog >> any: info >> >> template: >> - id: default >> global-module: mod-stats >> >> mod-stats: >> - id: default >> >> policy: >> - id: RSAPol >> algorithm: RSASHA256 >> ksk-size: 2048 >> zsk-size: 1024 >> >> zone: >> - domain: s0.mydomain.com >> storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db >> file: db.s0 >> dnssec-signing: on >> dnssec-policy: RSAPol >> >> On launching Knot, this works as expected: >> >> - The necessary key pairs are generated and stored in /var/lib/knot/keys in the clear, with files data.db and lock.db created in /var/lib/knot. >> - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. >> >> 2. I next tried with SoftHSM for the low-level cryptographic support. The knot.conf file is the same as above, with the following changes: >> >> - I added a keystore section: >> >> keystore: >> - id: SoftHSM >> backend: pkcs11 >> config: "pkcs11:token=KNOT;pin-value=112233 libsofthsm2.so" >> >> - I modified the zone section to use SoftHSM: > > [DS] I expect you modified the policy section! > > Yes, I added a line > > keystore: SoftHSM > > I.e. the policy section reads > > policy: > - id: RSAPol > algorithm: RSASHA256 > ksk-size: 2048 > zsk-size: 1024 > keystore: SoftHSM > > I should have pointed this out explicitly - my mistake. > > >> >> zone: >> - domain: s0.mydomain.com >> storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db >> file: db.s0 >> dnssec-signing: on >> dnssec-policy: RSAPol >> keystore: SoftHMS >> > > Notice it should read keystore: SoftHSM. This is just a transcription error on my side - it is correct in the actual knot.conf file that I am using. > >> Before proceeding, I removed everything from /var/lib/knot. On launching knot again, this is what happens: >> >> - data.db and lock.db are created under /var/lib/knot, but no key pairs are created under /var/lib/knot/keys. >> - Key pairs are created under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens/adf76cd6-5411-843e-6036-b8523580ef94. >> - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. >> >> This is all pretty much as expected, in that the signing keys have been generated in the space set aside by SoftHSM, and the signatures have been computed by the SoftHSM module. >> >> Now what I was wondering is whether keymgr can be used to manage keys in SofHSM? By default, it would seem to be the case that whenever I generate a key pair with keymgr, the key pair is stored under /var/lib/knot/keys, in the clear. Nothing seems to change under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens as a result of such a keymgr command. This is the case no matter what version of the knot.conf files described above I use. > > [DS] What are your parameters to keymgr? Don't you use default configuration (-d parameter)? > > No parameters. I just invoke it as > > keymgr mydomain.com. generate algorithm=RSASHA256 > > Specifying -d /tmp will create db files under /tmp, and a keys directory under /tmp containing the actual keys in the clear. The essence of the issue remains the same though: the private keys are in the clear, and don't seem to have been generated by SoftHSM. > > >> Here is my question: >> >> Is keymgr capable of managing keys in some separate device - SoftHSM, or a real, hardware HSM - or is it limited to keys generated by the default mechanism, with no HSM? > > [DS] Keymgr follows the zone's policy. So it uses the keystore which is configured for the zone. > > That's what I thought. Here's the thing though: in the knot.conf file above I changed the config entry in the keystore section, so that the wrong user PIN is supplied when attempting to access the services of the SoftHSM module. However, when using the keymgr command above, key pairs are are still generated without error, and stored outside the disk area allocated for SoftHSM. This makes me think that SoftHSM is not being used for this operation. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that when I launch knot with that incorrect PIN in knot.conf, signatures are not computed and I get errors in syslog to that effect. > > The bottom line is that, although key pairs are definitely created by SoftHSM, and stored in the disk area for SoftHSM, when the automatic key generation process, as driven by knot.conf, kicks in, when using keymgr I have yet to be able to get SoftHSM to generate key pairs and store them in its disk area. What am I doing wrong? > > > >> >> I notice that in previous versions of Knot, the keymgr utility supported options to use different keystores. Such options seem to be gone from keymgr as distributed with Knot 2.9.5. Can anybody elaborate on why they were removed, and whether some other utility is provided to achieve the same goals? >> >> Ultimately, what I am interested in is to have all of my keys so that they are available to the HSM alone, and I want to find out what tools does Knot provide - if any - to manage those keys, bearing in mind that they will have to be protected in permanent storage until such time that they are meant to be loaded into the HSM to be used. This is crucial, for most HSMs won't keep any keys across power cycles, and even when they do, they number that they can keep will in general be too small for my needs. >> >> >> >>

4 roky, 1 měsíc

1
0
0 0

Re: [knot-dns-users] keymgr and keystores

by Full Name

Thanks for your reply. Please see my comments below. -----Original Message----- From: "Daniel Salzman" [daniel.salzman(a)nic.cz] Date: 05/02/2021 04:51 AM To: knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] keymgr and keystores On 4/30/21 7:47 PM, Full Name wrote: > I am evaluating version 2.9.5 of Knot, in particular in what concerns key management. This examination has resulted in the following issues/questions, which I would like to bring up to this forum for discussion/clarification: > > 1. I have been testing with the default Knot out-of-the-box setup, with the following knot.conf file: > > server: > listen: [10.0.0.1 ] > > log: > - target: syslog > any: info > > template: > - id: default > global-module: mod-stats > > mod-stats: > - id: default > > policy: > - id: RSAPol > algorithm: RSASHA256 > ksk-size: 2048 > zsk-size: 1024 > > zone: > - domain: s0.mydomain.com > storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db > file: db.s0 > dnssec-signing: on > dnssec-policy: RSAPol > > On launching Knot, this works as expected: > > - The necessary key pairs are generated and stored in /var/lib/knot/keys in the clear, with files data.db and lock.db created in /var/lib/knot. > - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. > > 2. I next tried with SoftHSM for the low-level cryptographic support. The knot.conf file is the same as above, with the following changes: > > - I added a keystore section: > > keystore: > - id: SoftHSM > backend: pkcs11 > config: "pkcs11:token=KNOT;pin-value=112233 libsofthsm2.so" > > - I modified the zone section to use SoftHSM: [DS] I expect you modified the policy section! Yes, I added a line keystore: SoftHSM I.e. the policy section reads policy: - id: RSAPol algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 1024 keystore: SoftHSM I should have pointed this out explicitly - my mistake. > > zone: > - domain: s0.mydomain.com > storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db > file: db.s0 > dnssec-signing: on > dnssec-policy: RSAPol > keystore: SoftHMS > Notice it should read keystore: SoftHSM. This is just a transcription error on my side - it is correct in the actual knot.conf file that I am using. > Before proceeding, I removed everything from /var/lib/knot. On launching knot again, this is what happens: > > - data.db and lock.db are created under /var/lib/knot, but no key pairs are created under /var/lib/knot/keys. > - Key pairs are created under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens/adf76cd6-5411-843e-6036-b8523580ef94. > - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. > > This is all pretty much as expected, in that the signing keys have been generated in the space set aside by SoftHSM, and the signatures have been computed by the SoftHSM module. > > Now what I was wondering is whether keymgr can be used to manage keys in SofHSM? By default, it would seem to be the case that whenever I generate a key pair with keymgr, the key pair is stored under /var/lib/knot/keys, in the clear. Nothing seems to change under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens as a result of such a keymgr command. This is the case no matter what version of the knot.conf files described above I use. [DS] What are your parameters to keymgr? Don't you use default configuration (-d parameter)? No parameters. I just invoke it as keymgr mydomain.com. generate algorithm=RSASHA256 Specifying -d /tmp will create db files under /tmp, and a keys directory under /tmp containing the actual keys in the clear. The essence of the issue remains the same though: the private keys are in the clear, and don't seem to have been generated by SoftHSM. > Here is my question: > > Is keymgr capable of managing keys in some separate device - SoftHSM, or a real, hardware HSM - or is it limited to keys generated by the default mechanism, with no HSM? [DS] Keymgr follows the zone's policy. So it uses the keystore which is configured for the zone. That's what I thought. Here's the thing though: in the knot.conf file above I changed the config entry in the keystore section, so that the wrong user PIN is supplied when attempting to access the services of the SoftHSM module. However, when using the keymgr command above, key pairs are are still generated without error, and stored outside the disk area allocated for SoftHSM. This makes me think that SoftHSM is not being used for this operation. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that when I launch knot with that incorrect PIN in knot.conf, signatures are not computed and I get errors in syslog to that effect. The bottom line is that, although key pairs are definitely created by SoftHSM, and stored in the disk area for SoftHSM, when the automatic key generation process, as driven by knot.conf, kicks in, when using keymgr I have yet to be able to get SoftHSM to generate key pairs and store them in its disk area. What am I doing wrong? > > I notice that in previous versions of Knot, the keymgr utility supported options to use different keystores. Such options seem to be gone from keymgr as distributed with Knot 2.9.5. Can anybody elaborate on why they were removed, and whether some other utility is provided to achieve the same goals? > > Ultimately, what I am interested in is to have all of my keys so that they are available to the HSM alone, and I want to find out what tools does Knot provide - if any - to manage those keys, bearing in mind that they will have to be protected in permanent storage until such time that they are meant to be loaded into the HSM to be used. This is crucial, for most HSMs won't keep any keys across power cycles, and even when they do, they number that they can keep will in general be too small for my needs. > > > > -- https://lists.nic.cz/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-user

4 roky, 1 měsíc

2
1
0 0

keymgr and keystores

by Full Name

I am evaluating version 2.9.5 of Knot, in particular in what concerns key management. This examination has resulted in the following issues/questions, which I would like to bring up to this forum for discussion/clarification: 1. I have been testing with the default Knot out-of-the-box setup, with the following knot.conf file: server: listen: [10.0.0.1 ] log: - target: syslog any: info template: - id: default global-module: mod-stats mod-stats: - id: default policy: - id: RSAPol algorithm: RSASHA256 ksk-size: 2048 zsk-size: 1024 zone: - domain: s0.mydomain.com storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db file: db.s0 dnssec-signing: on dnssec-policy: RSAPol On launching Knot, this works as expected: - The necessary key pairs are generated and stored in /var/lib/knot/keys in the clear, with files data.db and lock.db created in /var/lib/knot. - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. 2. I next tried with SoftHSM for the low-level cryptographic support. The knot.conf file is the same as above, with the following changes: - I added a keystore section: keystore: - id: SoftHSM backend: pkcs11 config: "pkcs11:token=KNOT;pin-value=112233 libsofthsm2.so" - I modified the zone section to use SoftHSM: zone: - domain: s0.mydomain.com storage: /var/lib/MyZones/db file: db.s0 dnssec-signing: on dnssec-policy: RSAPol keystore: SoftHMS Before proceeding, I removed everything from /var/lib/knot. On launching knot again, this is what happens: - data.db and lock.db are created under /var/lib/knot, but no key pairs are created under /var/lib/knot/keys. - Key pairs are created under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens/adf76cd6-5411-843e-6036-b8523580ef94. - The appropriate zone is signed, with the file containing the signed data under /var/lib/MyZones/db. This is all pretty much as expected, in that the signing keys have been generated in the space set aside by SoftHSM, and the signatures have been computed by the SoftHSM module. Now what I was wondering is whether keymgr can be used to manage keys in SofHSM? By default, it would seem to be the case that whenever I generate a key pair with keymgr, the key pair is stored under /var/lib/knot/keys, in the clear. Nothing seems to change under /var/lib/softhsm/tokens as a result of such a keymgr command. This is the case no matter what version of the knot.conf files described above I use. Here is my question: Is keymgr capable of managing keys in some separate device - SoftHSM, or a real, hardware HSM - or is it limited to keys generated by the default mechanism, with no HSM? I notice that in previous versions of Knot, the keymgr utility supported options to use different keystores. Such options seem to be gone from keymgr as distributed with Knot 2.9.5. Can anybody elaborate on why they were removed, and whether some other utility is provided to achieve the same goals? Ultimately, what I am interested in is to have all of my keys so that they are available to the HSM alone, and I want to find out what tools does Knot provide - if any - to manage those keys, bearing in mind that they will have to be protected in permanent storage until such time that they are meant to be loaded into the HSM to be used. This is crucial, for most HSMs won't keep any keys across power cycles, and even when they do, they number that they can keep will in general be too small for my needs.

4 roky, 1 měsíc

2
1
0 0

Re: [knot-dns-users] Fwd: [knot-resolver-users] Any "gothcas" going from 2.65 to 3.04 I should know about?

by libor.peltan

Hi Chris, first of all, you seem to be talking about Knot DNS, so it's proper to switch to correct mailing list, instead of Knot Resolver's one. I assume you have read all the single-version migration guides below https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/singlehtml/index.html#upgrade-2-6-x-to-2-7… . It's clear that when migrating over multiple versions, you need to take care about all the notes at once. What databases exactly are you talking about? Knot DNS uses multiple databases for different purposes, e.g. journal or KASP DB. The good news is, their format does not change much, and when it does, it's usually backwards-compatible, with some exceptions. I would strongly recommend that you clone your environment, perform the migration in some "playground" setup first, and observe if everything went well; all before migration your production setup ;) Should you encounter any issues, please contact us on our mailing-list. Anyway, you might consider a multi-step migration, so that you would migrate by just one (major) version at once, like this: 2.6.5 -> 2.7.8 -> 2.8.5 -> 2.9.9 -> 3.0.5. Thanks! Libor Dne 09. 04. 21 v 8:13 Daniel Salzman napsal(a): > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [knot-resolver-users] Any "gothcas" going from 2.65 to 3.04 I should know about? > Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 23:03:54 -0700 > From: Chris <knot(a)tacomawireless.net> > Reply-To: Knot Resolver Users List <knot-resolver-users(a)lists.nic.cz> > To: knot-resolver-users <knot-resolver-users(a)lists.nic.cz> > > Hi. Moving a couple of our servers to new hardware, and > taking that opportunity to upgrade some of the services > at the same time. The main one being knot. Moving from > a 2.65 context to 3.04. I've read the upgrade doc, and > while there isn't a 2.65 --> 3.04. It appears for our > environment that the changed/removed stanzas won't > have much of an impact *except* as they relate to the > database. That is; it appears that it isn't going to > be a smooth transition, as they appear to be incompatible. > Is that right? Do I need to rewrite all the keys && > serials, and start from scratch? If so, as we have > a huge number of domains, this will be an enormous task. > Is this avoidable? > > Thank you for any and all insight into this transition. > > --Chris

4 roky, 2 měsíce

3
4
0 0

Preventing changes to zone files

by Matthew Pounsett

Is there a way to configure Knot to avoid overwriting a zone file when it's doing automatic signing? I was hoping some combination of zonefile-load and journal-content would tell Knot to store its internally managed data in the journal instead of in the zone file, but I haven't found that combination. I don't see any other likely candidates in the config options, but hoping I've missed something...

4 roky, 2 měsíce

2
2
0 0

Knot DNS 2.9.9 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.9.9! This version only backports some fixes from 3.0.5 version. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.9/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 2 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.5 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.5! This version primarily fixes issues relating zone journal, zone backup, and DNSSEC key handling. The most serious bug might cause malformed zone journal if 'journal-contents: all' or 'zonefile-sync: -1' is configured. Besides the fix, an additional detection of this state is introduced. So if "malformed data" error appears after the upgrade, the journal data are already broken and there is unfortunately no better way than purging the journal (e.g. knotc -f zone-purge +journal affected.zone.net.). Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.5/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 2 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Change journal-content changes to all

by André Keller

Good afternoon, in preparation for Knot 3.1, I wanted to update our template that uses zonefile-load: difference-no-serial from journal-content: changes to journal-content: all. However, it seems that we somehow have to update the existing journal. Otherwise it seems the first change to a zone after that change, will lead to the following error (running knot 3.0.4): error: [example.net.] zone event 'load' failed (semantic check) Subsequent changes seem to be applied just fine. What is the proposed strategy to change this setting? Regards André

4 roky, 2 měsíce

2
4
0 0

Extended expiration of Knot DNS Packaging GPG key

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, I would like to inform users of our Debian packages (https://deb.knot-dns.cz/knot and https://deb.knot-dns.cz/knot-latest) that the initial Knot DNS Packaging GPG key 8A0EFB02C84B1E9B expired on 2021-03-13. Its expiration time had already been extended to 2022-11-11 a few months ago. But still you can get a GPG error when refreshing the repository. Please update your apt.gpg file from https://deb.knot-dns.cz/knot/apt.gpg or https://deb.knot-dns.cz/knot-latest/apt.gpg. Thank you, Daniel

4 roky, 2 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Old key is being used

by Thomas

Hi, we performed successfully an algorithm rollover. After changing the algorithm in the configuration file everything worked as expected. All zones have been updated to the new algorithm. When I now sign a new zone the zone is being signed with the old algorithm's key and an algorithm rollover is being triggered immediately. Is this an expected behavior? How can I avoid this? Do I have to delete the old key? Thanks a lot, Thomas

4 roky, 3 měsíce

5
14
0 0

Figuring out inconsistent logging

by Matthew Pounsett

Hi! I have two Debian 10 Buster systems, both patched up current, and both running Knot 3.0.4-1~cz.nic~buster1 from the apt repository at https://deb.knot-dns.cz/knot-latest/. Both Knot installations have virtually identical configs .. really only different in the related hosts and zone lists. Their logging configs are both: log: - target: syslog any: info One of these Knot instances logs to syslog, and the other logs to systemd-journald. I'm trying to figure out why the difference, and I've come up empty. The Knot docs simply say that if Knot is compiled against systemd, then a 'syslog' setting will use systemd-journald. Mostly I want to know so that I can convince the one using journald to stop doing that. :) What other things might trigger Knot to use syslog on a systemd-managed host?

4 roky, 3 měsíce

2
6
0 0

usage of 2 different dnssec policies

by Thomas E.

Hi, is it possible to have two different DNSSEC policies in place? For example having one domain singed with Alg 8 and another one with Alg 13? Thanks a lot, Thomas

4 roky, 4 měsíce

2
1
0 0

Dynamic update for dnskey

by Ulrich Wisser

Hi! Today we tried to do a dynamic update to the dnskey set. What we want to do is to import the ZSK from another signer. Didn’t work so well. Feb 16 17:15:28 ip-172-31-38-41 knotd[24222]: warning: DDNS, refusing to update DNSSEC-related record I guess knot doesn’t like dynamic DNSSEC updates. I even tried with policy manual:on. What does one have to do to be allowed to add (or delete) DNSKEY records? /Ulrich

4 roky, 4 měsíce

2
3
0 0

Zone-freeze appears not to work

by James Garnett

Hello all, I am attempting to test freezing a zone, and something appears not to be working (that something could be my understanding of how it is supposed to work). Using a very simple example.com zone (the default that ships with v3.0.4), I am able to query for "mail.example.com" and get the correct response back. I then query for "test.example.com" and get an NXDOMAIN, as expected. Then I do the following: $ sudo knotc zone-freeze example.com OK $ Doing a zone-status, I see: $ sudo knotc zone-status example.com [example.com.] role: master | serial: 2010111219 | transaction: none | freeze: yes | expiration: not scheduled | notify: not scheduled $ sudo knotc zone-begin example.com OK $ sudo knotc zone-set example.com test 3600 A 150.150.150.150 OK $ sudo knotc zone-commit example.com OK $ sudo knotc zone-flush example.com OK $ After the zone-flush, I am able to query for "test.example.com" and I get back the A-record with address 150.150.150.150. I would have thought that with the zone frozen, the zone-flush would not go through and the A-record for "test" would not be added. Am I missing something obvious, or does zone-freeze just not work in version 3.0.4? Thanks in advance, ~J

4 roky, 4 měsíce

2
2
0 0

knot-3.0.4 continuously re-signing DNSSEC zone

by Marek Szuba

Hello, I have just run into a weird problem and since I have failed to look this up on the Web myself, I wonder if anyone here could give me a pointer regarding what to do with it. I run a Linux/arm DNS server based on knot-3.0.4. It used to serve as a slave in a zone whose master was a knot-2.9, with automatic DNSSEC signing _on master only_ set up and working. The zone configuration (minus "master" and "acl" keywords) looked as follows: zonefile-load: difference-no-serial journal-content: all semantic-checks: on # dnssec-signing: on # dnssec-policy: nsec3 where "nsec3" is a policy also defined in Knot configuration, identical to the one used on the master. In this role everything worked fine. Recently it has been decided to retire the original master server and replace it with the erstwhile slave. I removed the "master" line from the zone configuration in knot.conf (yes, I did leave the DNSSEC line commented out) in addition to setting up replication to a new slave server, copied the key files + the KASP dump from the old master and installed them in the right places, then restarted knot. Again, so far so good. I then attempted to re-enable DNSSEC by uncommenting those two lines - and immediately after I'd run 'knotc reload' Knot began spamming the system log with lines like info: [example.com.] zone file parsed, serial corrected 2021020301 -> 2021020303 info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, key, tag 4533, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, KSK, public, active info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, key, tag 10532, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, public, active info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, signing started info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, successfully signed info: [example.com.] loaded, serial 2021020302 -> 2021020303 -> 2021020302, 113233 bytes info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-02-10T13:21:14+0000 info: [example.com.] zone file parsed, serial corrected 2021020301 -> 2021020303 info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, key, tag 4533, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, KSK, public, active info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, key, tag 10532, algorithm RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1, public, active info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, signing started info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, successfully signed info: [example.com.] loaded, serial 2021020302 -> 2021020303 -> 2021020302, 113233 bytes info: [example.com.] DNSSEC, next signing at 2021-02-10T13:21:14+0000 info: [example.com.] zone file parsed, serial corrected 2021020301 -> 2021020303 [...and so on...] This was accompanied by knot consistently requiring much more CPU power than usual. I also noticed that unlike before, running 'knotc zone-flush' or shutting Knot down does NOT update the plain-text zone files. From what I could see by removing old DNSSEC signatures and the NSEC3 chain from the zone file, restarting Knot and then querying the server with dig, the server does indeed sign the zone. Therefore, my current working hypothesis is that somehow Knot does not update its internal zone state following the successful signing, thus continuing to think the outdated zone file found on the file system is the latest available version. The problem is, I do not know why it does it or how I could make it stop. Any and all suggestions will be very much appreciated! Cheers, -- MS

4 roky, 4 měsíce

3
6
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.4 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.4! This version mostly fixes some issues in 3.0 features. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.4/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 4 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Warning about NOTAUTH error from notify

by Sadiq Saif

Hi all, I can't quite figure this out, I have two servers running Knot DNS 3.0.3 on Ubuntu 20.04. horus.bastetrix.net is the primary, sekhmet.bastetrix.net is the secondary. One of the zones hosted on these servers is selfhosting.cloud. Whenever I commit a change to selfhosting.cloud, this happens in the log. As you can see, for some reason the IPv4 address returns a NOTAUTH error and then Knot successfully notifies over IPv6. Dec 27 00:53:37 horus.bastetrix.net knotd[174159]: warning: [selfhosting.cloud.] notify, outgoing, remote 192.195.251.53@53, server responded with error 'NOTAUTH' Dec 27 00:53:37 horus.bastetrix.net knotd[174159]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] notify, outgoing, remote 2620:98:400c::53@53, serial 5 Dec 27 00:53:38 horus.bastetrix.net knotd[174159]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] IXFR, outgoing, remote 2620:98:400c::53@36778, started, serial 4 -> 5 Dec 27 00:53:38 horus.bastetrix.net knotd[174159]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] IXFR, outgoing, remote 2620:98:400c::53@36778, finished, 0.00 seconds, 1 messages, 295 bytes sekhmet only logs a successful notify and IXFR from the v6 address, nothing about the failed v4 notify: Dec 27 00:53:37 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] notify, incoming, remote 2620:98:400a::53@58782, serial 5 Dec 27 00:53:38 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] refresh, remote 2620:98:400a::53@53, remote serial 5, zone is outdated Dec 27 00:53:38 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] IXFR, incoming, remote 2620:98:400a::53@53, started Dec 27 00:53:38 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] IXFR, incoming, remote 2620:98:400a::53@53, finished, 0.00 seconds, 1 messages, 295 bytes Dec 27 00:53:38 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] refresh, remote 2620:98:400a::53@53, zone updated, 0.40 seconds, serial 4 -> 5 Dec 27 00:53:38 sekhmet.bastetrix.net knotd[536887]: info: [selfhosting.cloud.] zone file updated, serial 4 -> 5 I am attaching the knot.conf for both servers. I double checked both configs multiple times and don't see why that particular warning is happening during zone notify. Can someone shed some light on this mystery? -- Sadiq Saif https://bastetrix.com

4 roky, 5 měsíců

2
2
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.3 and 2.9.8 releases

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.3 and Knot DNS 2.9.8! These updates are recommended for users with on-slave DNSSEC signing deployments. Ubuntu/Debian packages of 3.0.3 version no longer link against jemalloc memory allocator. Because new versions of Knot DNS behave better with the default memory allocator. Changelogs: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.3/NEWS https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.8/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/documentation/ Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 6 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Active and backup signer

by Einar Bjarni Halldórsson

Hi, We're migrating our signer from OpenDNSSEC to Knot 3.0. Our new design will have one active signer and at least one backup signer. Zone data is deployed from git to both signers. We've got syncing of the keys working using `knotc zone-backup +nozonefile` and `knotc zone-restore +nozonefile`. I'm still unsure of how hot to keep the standby. In the dev env now I have the standby set to a manual dnssec policy to keep it from rolling it's keys. The keys are synced from the active signer every hour. Both the active and the backup signers are creating signatures but SOA serials don't match. Both signers have `serial-policy: dateserial` and `zonefile-sync: -1` but we're considering adding `zonefile-load: difference-no-serial`. We've discussed stopping signing on the backup altogether and including the zonefiles in the backup. The problem we have with this idea is that problems with signing on the backup won't be discovered until it goes active. Are other people doing active-backup signers and how do you set it up? .einar

4 roky, 6 měsíců

5
5
0 0

Missing private keys in backup

by Thomas E.

Hi (again), I was trying to backup and restore a server with the new knotc zone-backup/restore command. I recognized that only half of the private keys were in the backup, which leads to an error: 2020-12-08T14:44:00+0100 error: [xxx.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) 2020-12-08T14:44:00+0100 error: [xxx.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) Shouldn't the backup contain all private keys? Thanks, Thomas

4 roky, 6 měsíců

4
19
0 0

Algorithm Rollover

by Thomas E.

Hi, I was trying to backup and restore a server with the new knotc zone-backup/restore command. I recognized that only half of the private keys were in the backup, which leads to an error: 2020-12-08T14:44:00+0100 error: [xxx.] DNSSEC, failed to load private keys (not exists) 2020-12-08T14:44:00+0100 error: [xxx.] DNSSEC, failed to load keys (not exists) Shouldn't the backup contain all private keys? Thanks, Thomas

4 roky, 6 měsíců

1
1
0 0

Removing slave from confdb not working

by Zdenek Novy

Hello, I'm trying to remove the slave node from the master Knot, result code is 0, but no change happened. There is no information in the log file. Can you please help me, why does it happen? # knotc conf-get template[default].notify > template[default].notify = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # knotc conf-begin > OK # knotc conf-set -b template[default].notify 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 > OK # knotc conf-diff (no output) # knotc conf-get template[default].notify > template[default].notify = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Thanks for your help. -- Zdeněk Nový Linux administrator ACTIVE 24, s.r.o. Sokolovská 394/17 186 00 Praha 8 Web: http://www.active24.cz

4 roky, 6 měsíců

4
6
0 0

Too many transactions error

by Zdenek Novy

Hello, we are facing the issue with "Too many transactions" during configuring knot via knotc - we are using confdb. We are using Python3 worker and popen function to knotc socket. This is the log from the Python worker: [2020-12-07 08:58:13,001] [INFO] adding zone xxxxxxxx [2020-12-07 08:58:13,016] [ERROR] [event worker.job] Exception in job 'dns.add_zone' Traceback (most recent call last): ...... ACK Exception: error running command: 'conf-begin' retcode: 1 out: error: (too many transactions) Is there any limitation for number of open transactions and are we able to increase it? Is it possible to see, how many open transactions there are now? I can't see any message in the log file, is it possible to log conf-begin requests? Or are there any other ways, how to determine and guard the situation? Many thanks for your help -- Zdeněk Nový Linux administrator ACTIVE 24, s.r.o. Sokolovská 394/17 186 00 Praha 8 Web: http://www.active24.cz

4 roky, 6 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Removing slave from confdb not working

by Zdenek Novy

Hello, I'm trying to remove the slave node from the master Knot, result code is 0, but no change happen. There is no information in the log file. Can you please help me, why does it happen? # knotc conf-get template[default].notify > template[default].notify = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # knotc conf-begin > OK # knotc conf-set -b template[default].notify 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 > OK # knotc conf-diff (no output) # knotc conf-get template[default].notify > template[default].notify = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Thanks for your help. -- Zdeněk Nový Linux administrator ACTIVE 24, s.r.o. Sokolovská 394/17 186 00 Praha 8 Web: http://www.active24.cz

4 roky, 6 měsíců

1
0
0 0

DNSSEC with multiple authoritative servers

by Nils Trampel

Hello, as I plan to migrate an existing DNS setup to Knot, not only for deploying DNSSEC but also for synthesizing some records using mod-synthrecord, I am not sure as how to setup online signing when having multiple public authoritative name servers. My uncertainty is, if it is necessary to give them the same ZSKs and do the key rollover from the outside, or if the chain of trust isn't severed when they generate their own ZSKs based from a common KSK or even their distinct KSKs, and therefore provide different signatures. Best regards and thanks, Nils -- Nils Trampel GPG: 0x012BADD8

4 roky, 6 měsíců

5
10
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.2 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.2! This version fixes several bugs and brings some improvements. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.2/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Donation: https://donations.nic.cz/donate/?project=knot-dns Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 7 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Query Log of Knot DNS

by Vu Thi Hoan

Dear! We are learning about the Knot DNS to apply to our DNS Authoritative Secondary. However, we are wondering about the query log, i have read the document of DNS Knot Software (Knot DNS Documentation Release 2.9.4/ 8.3 dnstap – Dnstap traffic logging), query log of Knot DNS cannot get directly like BIND9, query log can get by dnstap tool. For Knot DNS Software, we cannot get log query continuosly and directly to the current syslog server, since raw log need to capture and then read after stop capture. I wanna to know how to get the query log continously when using Knot DNS or softwares of your DNS and other DNS of organizations have already applied. Can you share with us and help us to deploy Knot DNS to our DNS Authoritative Secondary. Best Regards, Vũ Thị Hoàn ================================================= DNS & VNIX - Trung tâm Internet Việt Nam Mobile: +84 916 961 631 Email: hoanvt(a)vnnic.vn

4 roky, 7 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Algorithm Rollover

by Thomas

Hi, the doc says that changing the policy algorithm field will trigger an algorithm rollover. Is there anything else one must consider or is the algorithm rollover done fully automated like the normal rollovers? Thanks, Thomas

4 roky, 7 měsíců

2
2
0 0

Unknown algorithm: rsasha1-nsec3-sha1

by Thomas

Hi, I need to generate keys of algorithm 7. But I receive this error: # keymgr example generate algorithm=rsasha1-nsec3-sha1 size=2048 ksk=yes Unknown algorithm: rsasha1-nsec3-sha1 Error (invalid parameter) I'm using the latest version of knot. Do I get something wrong here? It you be supported, right? Thanks Thomas

4 roky, 7 měsíců

2
2
0 0

dynamic updates (DDNS)

by Thomas

Hi! Is it safe to mix dynamic updates and manual editing of a zone? Thanks! Thomas

4 roky, 7 měsíců

7
20
0 0

Inter-operability issues with other DNS Servers

by Evilham

Ahoj, I've searched through the archives and read documentation+RFCs to no avail, so I hope you can help out. I run the authoritative DNS servers for an associative ISP in Barcelona (eXO.cat), and we are running them in FreeBSD using Knot DNS (2.9.5, but .6 and .7's changelogs do not point to a similar issue being solved). We have since then gotten a few reports from different parties of "DNS issues", I am reasonably sure to have pinpointed this down to badly configured DNS resolvers, but our weight is really too tiny to force any change; and the doubt remains as to whether or not this is on us. Without access to the resolvers it's also a tad tricky for us to reproduce. Things do work beautifully with pretty much all of the internet. This appears to be related to: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7873#section-5.2.3 (sometimes in connection with 5.2.4) Maybe someone with more experience and running at a larger scale has pointers on this topic. Specifically, I have observed: Case A: 1. (Probably Bind) Resolver contacts Knot DNS with Client Cookie and old Server Cookie 2. Knot DNS responds BADCOOKIE with the provided Client Cookie, Old Server Cookie, and adds the new server cookie. 3. Resolver contacts Knot DNS with the same Client Cookie and old Server Cokie 4. 2 and 3 repeat for a long time. 5. Domains end up not resolving. Case B: https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/8581 Their supplier says the DNS server "replies with BADCOOKIE to UDP queries", as if that were a bad thing; but from reading RFC7873, I understand that it is expected documented behaviour and the client ought to try again with the given Server Cookie. They say: "AIUI the resolver does retry, but again receives a BADCOOKIE response." I sadly don't have the tcpdump for those, but it could be just like case A again. These are the relevant bits from the config: server: rundir: "/var/run/knot" user: knot:knot listen: [ 0.0.0.0@53, ::@53 ] log: - target: syslog any: info statistics: append: off database: storage: "/var/db/knot" mod-cookies: - id: default badcookie-slip: 1 mod-rrl: - id: default rate-limit: 200 # Requests per second template: - id: default storage: "/var/db/knot/primary" semantic-checks: on disable-any: on serial-policy: dateserial file: "%s.zone" global-module: mod-cookies/default global-module: mod-rrl/default global-module: mod-stats - id: secondary storage: "/var/db/knot/secondary" semantic-checks: on disable-any: on serial-policy: dateserial file: "%s.zone" module: mod-cookies/default module: mod-rrl/default module: mod-stats - id: signed storage: "/var/db/knot/primary" dnssec-signing: on zonefile-load: difference semantic-checks: on disable-any: on serial-policy: dateserial file: "%s.zone" module: mod-cookies/default module: mod-rrl/default module: mod-stats We are not using anycast clusters or anything like that. A quick solution would be to disable cookies or to experiment with noudp, but that's something we'd like to avoid. The name servers in question are: - ns3.exo.cat - ns4.exo.cat - ns1.unchat.cat (not association, but identical setup) All tests I've ran against the servers and the associated domains (e.g. exo.cat + unchat.cat) appear to be fine. There is an odd one with https://dnsviz.net/d/unchat.cat/dnssec/, but other tests like https://www.zonemaster.net/result/d530cb253298b56c do not report any issues. Thank you in advance for any pointers you may have (and for Knot DNS!), -- Evilham

4 roky, 7 měsíců

4
6
0 0

Knot upgrade

by Oto Stefan

Hallo everybody, this is just a little remark concerning the 'knot' upgrade from 2.9.x to 3.0.x. The 'update-owner-name' in the 'acl' section of the configuration file can now be either the FQDN (with trailing dot) or a relative name to the zone, while it used to be a domain name before (without obligatory dot at the end). The documentation was updated correctly: Doc for 2.9: acl - id: owner_type_rule action: update update-type: [A, AAAA, MX] # Updates are only allowed to update records of the specified types update-owner: name # The allowed owners are specified by the list on the next line update-owner-name: [a.example.com, b.example.com, c.example.com] update-owner-match: equal # The owners of records in an update must be exactly equal to the names in the list Doc for 3.0: acl - id: owner_type_rule action: update update-type: [A, AAAA, MX] # Updates are only allowed to update records of the specified types update-owner: name # The allowed owners are specified by the list on the next line update-owner-name: [a, b.example.com.] # Non-FQDN names are relative to the effective zone name update-owner-match: equal # The owners of records in an update must be exactly equal to the names in the list However; I did not notice the subtle change and was struggling for a while to bring the dynamic zone update into a working state again . Maybe, this saves a little time to someone else. Regards and thanks for a great piece of software, Oto Stefan

4 roky, 8 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Warning - TCP ports binding in Knot DNS versions 3.0.0 and 3.0.1

by David Vasek

Hello Knot DNS users! We would like to inform you about a change in Knot DNS behaviour in versions 3.0.0 and 3.0.1. These two versions don't allow sharing of TCP ports between programs, including other knotd instances (SO_REUSEADDR isn't set). While this behaviour is better from point of view of security, the downside of it is that when restarting a knotd daemon, binding to a TCP port may fail after a restart if the restart is immediate. In such a case, an error is logged and Knot starts its operation on other configured ports only. To verify that all TCP ports have been bound successfully after Knot restart, please always check the log for possible errors. Such errors would be close to the initial message about Knot DNS starting. Since there was a complaint about this change, we plan to re-enable TCP ports reuse in future releases. We also ponder making knotd exit if it fails to bind to any of configured TCP ports. We would like hear from you whether such a behaviour is what you, users, want best. Please, let us know if you prefer this or a different solution. With regards, David Vašek CZ.NIC

4 roky, 8 měsíců

4
3
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.1 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.1! It's recommended to update from 3.0.0 version if you serve DNSSEC signed zones with NSEC3. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.1/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html Support and sponsorship: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 8 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot DNS 2.9.7 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.9.7! This is a bugfix version of previous stable branch. It's recommended to update from older 2.9.x versions if you serve DNSSEC signed zones with NSEC3. Knot DNS 3.0.1 will be released tomorrow. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.7/NEWS Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.9/html Support and sponsorship: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 8 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Debugging high CPU / Load - normal?

by Jonathan Hewlett

Hi, We run around 50 knot servers around the world, with great success - thanks for the software! We are just a little curious about seemingly high CPU usage, and how best to interpret the results, if someone could advise? Specifically, we are seeing the majority of the cpu time in 'system' and not 'user', what would that suggest is happening perhaps? Any tuning help gratefully received! Our platform (sample) 24 Core CPU E5-2440 0 @ 2.40 64Gb RAM SSD knot-2.9.5, running on Centos 8.2 Currently receiving around 4k pps Server is authoritative for a 278 zones, the largest zone file being around 600Mb Output of top top - 20:50:38 up 6 days, 4:49, 2 users, load average: 13.47, 12.34, 11.83 Tasks: 321 total, 2 running, 318 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie %Cpu0 : 4.0 us, 34.1 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.3 id, 0.3 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu1 : 4.3 us, 19.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu2 : 4.3 us, 33.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu3 : 5.0 us, 21.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu4 : 3.3 us, 34.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 61.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu5 : 3.0 us, 20.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu6 : 4.0 us, 35.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu7 : 5.0 us, 18.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu8 : 2.0 us, 35.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 62.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu9 : 2.0 us, 20.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 77.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu10 : 3.7 us, 34.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 61.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu11 : 3.3 us, 20.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu12 : 2.3 us, 34.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 62.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu13 : 3.3 us, 20.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu14 : 2.3 us, 33.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 59.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 3.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu15 : 3.3 us, 19.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu16 : 2.3 us, 34.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 58.7 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 4.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu17 : 2.3 us, 21.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu18 : 3.3 us, 34.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 57.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 4.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu19 : 5.0 us, 19.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu20 : 2.7 us, 35.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 60.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 1.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu21 : 1.7 us, 20.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 77.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu22 : 4.7 us, 32.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 58.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 3.7 si, 0.0 st %Cpu23 : 2.3 us, 19.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st MiB Mem : 64107.4 total, 46764.9 free, 11733.6 used, 5608.8 buff/cache MiB Swap: 32248.0 total, 32248.0 free, 0.0 used. 51670.0 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 213370 knot 20 0 34.0g 9.6g 41784 S 644.9 15.3 1319:12 /usr/sbin/knotd Thanks again for this great product. Jonathan

4 roky, 8 měsíců

3
9
0 0

Catalog zone configuration/zone auto configuration bootstrapping

by Frank Matthieß

Hello all, i stuck a little bit with the configuration of the new catalog zone feature in knot dns 3.0.0. The catalog zone replication is running quite well, but bootstrapping this feature to replicate the config for zones wont work for me. The zone name of the catalog zone is "zone.catalog". The primary name server uses this config: > # Configuration export (Knot DNS 3.0.0) > zone: > - domain: "zone.catalog." > file: "%s" > notify: [ "ns1.frank.REDACTED.DOM", "ns2.frank.REDACTED.DOM" ] > acl: [ "ns1.frank.REDACTED.DOM", "ns2.frank.REDACTED.DOM" ] > catalog-role: "interpret" > catalog-template: "catalog-zone-template" > > - domain: "dom-siew9tho.invalid." The zone has this content: > [zone.catalog.] zone.catalog. 60 NS nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. > [zone.catalog.] zone.catalog. 60 SOA nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. hostmaster.REDACTED.DOM. 1601540072 16384 2048 1048576 2560 > [zone.catalog.] id-ies3eidiev4ooquahgoh.zone.catalog. 0 PTR dom-siew9tho.invalid. > [zone.catalog.] version.zone.catalog. 0 TXT "2" Adding the following config to the primary works: > conf-begin > conf-set zone.domain "dom-siew9tho.invalid." > conf-commit > zone-begin dom-siew9tho.invalid. > zone-set dom-siew9tho.invalid. @ 60 SOA nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM. hostmaster.REDACTED.DOM. 1 16384 2048 1048576 2560 > zone-set dom-siew9tho.invalid. @ 60 NS nshp.REDACTED.DOM. > zone-commit dom-siew9tho.invalid. Query one of the secondaries (ns1) gives me: > error: (no such zone found) [dom-siew9tho.invalid.] The config of ns1: > # Configuration export (Knot DNS 3.0.0) > template: > - id: "catalog-zone-template" > storage: "/var/lib/knot/zones" > file: "%s" > semantic-checks: "on" > dnssec-signing: "off" > serial-policy: "unixtime" > kasp-db: "/var/lib/knot/kasp-db" > > zone: > - domain: "zone.catalog." > file: "%s" > master: "nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM" > acl: "nshp.frank.REDACTED.DOM" > catalog-role: "interpret" > catalog-template: "catalog-zone-template" I'm sure i miss one or more parts and/or i have a serious misunderstanding of the bootstrapping setup for this feature. - frank -- Frank Matthieß Mail: frank.matthiess(a)virtion.de phone: +49 521 44 81 58 17 GnuPG: 9F81 BD57 C898 6059 86AA 0E9B 6B23 DE93 01BB 63D1 virtion GmbH Südring 11, DE 33647 Bielefeld Geschäftsführer: Michael Kutzner Handelsregister HRB 40374, Amtsgericht Bielefeld, USt-IdNr.: DE278312983

4 roky, 8 měsíců

3
4
0 0

copy key from one instance to another

by Ulrich Wisser

Hi! For a special project I need to sign the same zone on two servers with the same key. How can I create a key and import it in both instances? Or export an automatically generated key from one instance and import in the other instance? Kind regards from Stockholm /Ulrich

4 roky, 9 měsíců

2
1
0 0

termination of obsolete Knot DNS OBS repos

by Jakub Ružička

Following obsolete OBS package repositories will be terminated without mercy on Friday 18th September 2020: * [knot-dns](https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:CZ-NIC:knot-dns) * [knot-dns-latest](https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:CZ-NIC:knot-d… If you are using these repos, please refer to [Knot DNS download page](https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/) for links to current package repos for your favourite distribution. Jakub Ružička CZ.NIC packager

4 roky, 9 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot DNS 3.0.0 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 3.0.0! This version introduces lots of new features. You can read more about them on this blog post https://en.blog.nic.cz/2020/09/09/knot-dns-3-0-news/ Don't forget to check the updated benchmarks https://www.knot-dns.cz/benchmark/ Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v3.0.0/NEWS Migration: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html/migration.html#upgrade-2-9-x-to-3-0-x Download: https://www.knot-dns.cz/download/ Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/html Support and sponsorship: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 9 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot DNS 2.9.6 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.9.6! This is mostly a bug fix version with some small improvements. Just a notice, on September 9th we are going to release Knot DNS 3.0.0, which will become a new Current Latest version. Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/raw/v2.9.6/NEWS Source code: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.9.6.tar.xz https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.9.6.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.9/html Support and funding: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

4 roky, 9 měsíců

1
0
0 0

keymgr doesn't delete (remove) keys

by Chris

I'm currently on 2.6.5, and am moving everything to a new server I've created that's using the newest version. However, I've got a couple of zones I am trying to clean up before the move. In my effort to resign these zones, I'm retiring/removing keys associated with these zones prior to resigning them. But keymgr(8) isn't working as expected. eg; 12:25pm Fri, 21 # keymgr some.zone. set 09696 retire=20200821122736 remove=20200821122755 12:28pm Fri, 21 # keymgr some.zone. list iso ... 83ded1e7f4375657fe12ca666d4bbc6c33b7edea ksk=no zsk=yes tag=09696 algorithm=5 public-only=no created=2020-05-06T04:42:32 pre-active=2020-05-06T04:42:32 publish=2020-05-06T05:42:32 ready=1970-01-01T00:00:00 active=2020-05-06T18:42:32 retire-active=1970-01-01T00:00:00 retire=2020-08-21T12:27:36 post-active=1970-01-01T00:00:00 remove=2020-08-21T12:27:55 ... As you can see, it's 12:28 but the key was not removed. What am I (missing/misunderstanding? Thanks. --Chris

4 roky, 9 měsíců

2
2
0 0

KSK and ZKS roll-overs on schedule

by Thomas

Hi, I have another requirement for a capability test. I need to perform ZSK and KSK rollovers on specific times. Something like KSK rollover after exactly 60 hours. Or ZSK rollover after exactly 24 hours and another one after another 24 hours. And so on... One additional requirement is that I need to pre-generate the keys. I was thinking of doing it with manual key management enabled and to use the keymgr tool for it. But I'm unsure about how to set the key attributes correctly an in what order. At what point I have to set the new key to active, and how can I remove the old key, and so on... I have never done it manually as I normally use Knots automatic key management. Is the "knotc zone-key-rollover" useful here, or is it only useful in an automatic key management set up? I really appreciate any help here! Thanks a lot, Thomas

4 roky, 10 měsíců

3
2
0 0

Re: [knot-dns-users] Unexpected behaviour of `knotc zone-set` when adding a TXT record

by Daniel Salzman

Hello, You have to escape the quotes: zone-set bastetrix.com @ 86400 TXT \"v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com -all\" Regards, Daniel On 8/9/20 4:47 AM, Sadiq Saif wrote: > Hi all, > > Today I ran into some unexpected behaviour, I wanted to make a modification to the TTL (3600->86400) for the SPF TXT record for bastetrix.com, so I did the following: > > zone-set bastetrix.com @ 86400 TXT "v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com -all" > > But the result was unexpected, instead of modifying the record, I got a new record that looked like this: > > bastetrix.com. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1" "include:spf.messagingengine.com" " -all" > > RFC 7208 Section 3.3: > > 3.3. Multiple Strings in a Single DNS Record > > As defined in [RFC1035], Sections 3.3 and 3.3.14, a single text DNS > record can be composed of more than one string. If a published > record contains multiple character-strings, then the record MUST be > treated as if those strings are concatenated together without adding > spaces. For example: > > IN TXT "v=spf1 .... first" "second string..." > > is equivalent to: > > IN TXT "v=spf1 .... firstsecond string..." > > TXT records containing multiple strings are useful in constructing > records that would exceed the 255-octet maximum length of a > character-string within a single TXT record. > > If I'm not misreading this bit of the RFC, that record would result in a wrongly formatted SPF record without the correct spaces. > > And indeed when I added the same SPF record to another zone (bastetrix.net) using `knotc zone set` Fastmail's DNS record checker said that I had not added a SPF record. I had to edit the zone by hand in a text editor to fix the issue. > > Is this a bug in `knotc zone-set` or intended behaviour? Am I misunderstanding some implementation detail in TXT records or the RFC? > -- > Sadiq Saif > Bastetrix LLC >

4 roky, 10 měsíců

1
0
0 0

re-sign zone

by Thomas

Hi, I have the requirement to re-sign my zones exactly every 24 hours. I'm not sure how to achieve this, because I'm not clear about the correlation of the following parameters: zsk-lifetime propagation-delay rrsig-lifetime rrsig-refresh rrsig-pre-refresh Can anybody give a hint what values I need to have an exact re-signing period of 24 hours? Thanks a lot, Thomas

4 roky, 10 měsíců

3
3
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

knot-dns-users