fred-users

fred-users@lists.nic.cz

1 participants
408 discussions

past credit balance query from a registrar

by Dr P Nyirenda

Hello, Hope this finds you well in these troubled times. We have a persistent request from a registrar asking us to "confirm what our balance was on the 1st of December 2019" ... about 12 montsh ago. We have repeatedly told the registrar that by the nature of EPP transactions on a registry running FRED, we do not keep such balances on the registry on a day to day basis except in regular backups of the database. I would like to hear what you think about such a request from a registrar which connects to a registry running the FRED registry system and how you would respond to it. Is there an easier way of dealing with such a request other than by remounting a whole FRED database on a test server from a previous FRED backup of that date ? Remounting a FRED database backup is a major task and we have told them that if they insist then we would raise a fee or charge for it. Any help? Regards, Paulos ============================= Dr Paulos B Nyirenda NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD http://www.nic.mw SDNP: http://www.sdnp.org.mw Tel: +265-(0)-882 089 166 Cell: +265-(0)-888-824787 WhatsApp: +265-(0)-887386433 -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com

5 let, 1 měsíc

FRED in Docker perhaps?

by Piotr Przybył

Hello FRED team I've skimmed the FRED docs and AFAICT there's no distribution in form of Docker image(s). Does anyone have plans "dockerizing" FRED? (Please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to make any sort of pressure that anyone has to do something, I'm just asking and that's it.) Thank you Piotr

5 let, 5 měsíců

help test - GDPR compliance test phase on .mw domains - invitation

by Dr P Nyirenda

.mw Registrar, GDPR compliance test phase on .mw - invitation ======================================== I am pleased to advise that the Malawi .mw ccTLD registry on FRED has started a test phase for compliance on GDPR compliance for all and we would like to invite you to assist us to test. We have now mounted a test server to handle both EPP and WHOIS on ngoli3.sdnp.org.mw that you can test right away. A WHOIS query for any of your existing domains will show that we are now hiding details on the e-mail, phone, fax and other details while showing name, organisation, address, DNS servers. The database on the test server is that of 24 July 2020. You can compare the following: 1. Current WHOIS at: http://www.registrar.mw/whois-intro.php 2. Current command line WHOIS: $whois domains.mw -h ngoli.sdnp.org.mw 3. GDPR compliant test : http://ngoli3.sdnp.org.mw/whois 4. GDPR compliant command line test: $whois domains.mw -h ngoli3.sdnp.org.mw You can also test creating a new contact using EPP and you will find that the default is "hide" on the above details and it is up to the registrar to toggle this to "disclose" as needed. Please make sure that your EPP client is capable of handling the .mw GDPR complaint environment as you continue to conduct your business using the .mw registry. We will have this test phase running for at least two week from 1 August 2020 after which we will make a decision to move this test phase to the production environment. All modifications that you make on the test environment will be deleted and lost from ngoli3 at the end of the test phase, so, you can test as much as you need to without charge. Please let me know if you face any problems using the new GDPR compliant test .mw registry on EPP, WHOIS or any other service. These steps are very important to us. Regards, Dr Paulos B Nyirenda NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD http://www.nic.mw Tel: +265-(0)-882 089 166 Cell: +265-(0)-888-824787 WhatsApp: +265-(0)-887386433 -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com

5 let, 6 měsíců

HOW : query from registrar asking registry to list domains with expiry dates

by Dr P Nyirenda

Hello, As our list of registrars has grown, we are regularly getting a request from a registrar to "Please send me a list of domains under our registrar account with their expiry dates" As a registry using FRED registry, how do you handle such requests? We have so far just directed them to use the command list_domains under fred-client BUT we would like to here if others are handling this in a different or better way. Many of our new registrars are at the point of learning how to be a good registrar and so they often ask us for help like this. Regards, Paulos ====================== Dr Paulos B Nyirenda NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD http://www.registrar.mw Tel: +265-(0)-882 089 166 Cell: +265-(0)-888-824787 WhatsApp: +265-(0)-887386433 -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com

5 let, 7 měsíců

Domains Stuck at "To be deleted"

by Moeketsi Maphoi

Hi everyone, Our domains that expired in February and March are stuck in "to be deleted" state, they never get deleted. On manual deletion or renewal the output is: Error: ObjectStatusProhibitsOperation Manual run of '/usr/sbin/fred-admin --object_regular_procedure' executes but doesn't give any output. Zones are still being generated with such 'to be deleted' domains excluded. The timezone is set to UTC in postregsql.conf Enum_parameters are as follows: expiration_notify_period -30 expiration_dns_protection_period 30 expiration_letter_warning_period 34 validation_notify1_period -30 validation_notify2_period -15 regular_day_procedure_period 0 object_registration_protection_period 6 handle_registration_protection_period 0 regular_day_outzone_procedure_period 14 outzone_unguarded_email_warning_period 25 enum_validation_continuation_window 14 regular_day_procedure_zone Africa/Johannesburg expiration_registration_protection_period 61 What could be the cause of this? Regards. Moeketsi

5 let, 8 měsíců

EPP doesn't work

by Lem

Hi, My name is Lem. I tried to use curl to check EPP and got in log: [26/Apr/2020:15:25:36 +0600] 192.168.0.1 (process:16846) [sessionID 61959] Client connected [26/Apr/2020:15:25:36 +0600] 192.168.0.1 (process:16846) [sessionID 61959] Corba call (epp-cmd hello) [26/Apr/2020:15:25:36 +0600] 192.168.0.1 (process:16846) [sessionID 61959] Corba call ok *[26/Apr/2020:15:25:36 +0600] 192.168.0.1 (process:16846) [sessionID 61959] Invalid epp frame length (1347375952 bytes)* [26/Apr/2020:15:25:36 +0600] 192.168.0.1 (process:16846) [sessionID 61959] Session ended Please help me. What do I wrong? Output for curl: root# curl -k --cert /usr/share/fred-client/ssl/test-cert.pem --cacert /usr/share/fred-client/ssl/test-cert.pem --key /usr/share/fred-client/ssl/test-key.pem -vvvv -d '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0 epp-1.0.xsd"><command><login><clID>REG-CZ</clID><pw>qazQAZ123</pw><options><version>1.0</version><lang>en</lang></options><svcs><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/contact-1.6</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/nsset-1.2</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/domain-1.4</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/keyset-1.3</objURI><svcExtension><extURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/enumval-1.2</extURI></svcExtension></svcs></login><clTRID>sdmj001#20-04-15at18:48:03</clTRID></command></epp>' https://192.168.0.7:700 * Rebuilt URL to: https://192.168.0.7:700/ * Trying 192.168.0.7... * Connected to 192.168.0.7 (192.168.0.7) port 700 (#0) * found 1 certificates in /usr/share/fred-client/ssl/test-cert.pem * found 594 certificates in /etc/ssl/certs * ALPN, offering http/1.1 * SSL connection using TLS1.2 / ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 * server certificate verification SKIPPED * server certificate status verification SKIPPED * common name: 192.168.0.7 (matched) * server certificate expiration date OK * server certificate activation date OK * certificate public key: RSA * certificate version: #1 * subject: C...CN=192.168.0.7 * start date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 07:19:19 GMT * expire date: Mon, 22 Apr 2030 07:19:19 GMT * issuer: C...CN=192.168.0.7 * compression: NULL * ALPN, server accepted to use http/1.1 > POST / HTTP/1.1 > Host: 192.168.0.7:700 > User-Agent: curl/7.47.0 > Accept: */* > Content-Length: 700 > Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded > * upload completely sent off: 700 out of 700 bytes t<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0 epp-1.0.xsd"><greeting><svID>EPP server (DSDng)</svID><svDate>2020-04-26T15:31:16+06:00</svDate><svcMenu><version>1.0</version><lang>en</lang><lang>cs</lang><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/contact-1.6</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/domain-1.4</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/nsset-1.2</objURI><objURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/keyset-1.3</objURI><svcExtension><extURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/enumval-1.2</extURI><extURI>http://www.nic.cz/xml/epp/extra-addr-1.0</extURI></svcExtension></svcMenu><dcp><access><all/></access><statement><purpose><admin/><prov/></purpose><recipient><public/></recipient><retention><stated/></retention></statement></dcp></greeting></epp> * Connection #0 to host 192.168.0.7 left intact Sincerely, Lem.

5 let, 9 měsíců

Dependencies error for Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS

by lem

Hi, We try to install Fred for review features and start to use product. For installation we use link — https://fred.nic.cz/documentation/html/AdminManual/Installation/BinsUbuntu.… (1.2.2). But can't pass step 7. We got dependencies error (see below). fred-webwhois-apache needs *1.17.0-1~xenial+1*, but maximal package that I found on archive.nic.cz is *1.16.1-1~xenial+1*. How to resolve this problem? Sincerely, Lem */root@fred:~# apt install fred-webwhois-apache /*/ / /Reading package lists... Done/ /Building dependency tree / /Reading state information... Done/ /Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have/ /requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable/ /distribution that some required packages have not yet been created/ /or been moved out of Incoming./ /The following information may help to resolve the situation:/ /The following packages have unmet dependencies:/ / fred-webwhois-apache : Depends: fred-webwhois (= 1.17.0-1~xenial+1) but 1.16.1-1~xenial+1 is to be installed or/ / fred-webwhois-py3 (= 1.17.0-1~xenial+1) but it is not going to be installed/ /E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages./ */root@fred:~# lsb_release -a/* /No LSB modules are available./ /Distributor ID: Ubuntu/ /Description: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS/ /Release: 16.04/ /Codename: xenial/

5 let, 10 měsíců

FRED 2.40

by Zuzana Lena Ansorgova

Hi! We have announced a new release at last: https://fred.nic.cz/en/news/version-2-40-released/ Please, report if you have any trouble with the installation procedures using packages for Ubuntu or Fedora. If you have any questions, I'm sure our guys will be happy to answer them :) Greetings, Lena Guarantor of Docs for FRED

6 let, 4 měsíce

how to cc FRED registry notification e-mails to an admin e-mail address

by Dr P Nyirenda

Hello, I would like to find out if and how we can get a cc of every notification e-mail in FRED to go to a designated e-mail address for the attention or analysis of someone who adminsiters the FRED registry. I am aware that these e-mail notifications are archived in the FRED database but in our case the persons monitoring the registry do not have access to the database - and they should not have such sensitive access anyway The mailer config in FRED in our case is in /etc/fred/pyfred.conf and it does not give an option for such a cc address. If you worried about this or have or found a solution to it please let us know. Regards, Paulos ====================== Dr Paulos B Nyirenda NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD http://www.registrar.mw --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

6 let, 7 měsíců

Recommended Linux distro for FRED

by Johan Olsson

Hi, I want to install FRED but would like some guidance when it comes to which Linux Distro I should use. According to the documentation I could use Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus), Fedora 24, Fedora 25, RHEL 7 or CentOS 7 but if I don't have any special preferences which one is most fitting for the latest stable version of FRED? Would be eternally thankful if any helpful soul could point me in the right direction. Best regards Johan Olsson

6 let, 11 měsíců

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
41
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

fred-users