12 Srp
2015
12 Srp
'15
11:14
Hi,
On 11 August 2015 at 23:37, iorecvsendclose <iorecvsendclose(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Has anyone used the rosedb or dnsproxy modules
extensively in production?
I'm concerned about whether it would reliably scale as well as Knot does
without it. I'm evaluating knot in hopes that I can use it to offer part of
my would-be service to potentially millions of websites. I'm planning a free
usage tier would would hopefully be heavily utilized.
rosedb will scale, dnsproxy may (if you have a good link to the
original nameserver), and may not (if the original nameserver is
slow),
as it's synchronous. There's someone who has a similar use case to
yours and is making the dnsproxy asynchronous.
Regarding the specific implementation, I want to
provide an authoritative
DNS server that returns predefined values based on record types/host
(rosedb). If the host/record combo conditions aren't met, proxy the request
to the original nameserver(s). After reviewing the nightly code it looks
like I'll likely need to invest a lot of time in order to support that
chained query plan.
Thank you for any feedback in advance.
-Anonymous Coward
That sounds like a filtering use case to me, rosedb and dnsproxy
should be a good fit.
There are a few gotchas with the rosedb (e.g. no automatic DNSSEC),
but you probably know that.
Best,
Marek
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users