David,
it might in case EDNS0 is not used and >= 512b response would be generated.
We might revisit our approach is this poses a proven operational problem, but when I look
into DSC stats for .CZ I see <20% on non-EDNS0 queries and I am quite confident that
those queries are coming mostly from non-compliant clients that will never ask over TCP
again anyway. I'll ask Geoff whether he has some real-world numbers on that or if he
could run a quick test with his Google Ad Network Grand Abuse (GANGA :).
Cheers,
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
--------------------------------------------
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC
Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz
https://nic.cz/
--------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Conrad"
<drc(a)virtualized.org>
To: "Jan Včelák" <jan.vcelak(a)nic.cz>
Cc: "Johan Ihrén" <johani(a)netnod.se>se>, knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:42:20 PM
Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] Knot DNS 2.2.1 patch release
On May 25, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Jan Včelak
<jan.vcelak(a)nic.cz> wrote:
Do you think this could cause some operational
problems?
Is this going to cause fallback to TCP for root queries?
Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users