30 Čen
2015
30 Čen
'15
19:22
Ondřej Caletka wrote:
Dne 28.6.2015 v 01:04 Anand Buddhdev napsal(a):
You mean BCP 20 §4, right? :-)
The second scheme described in BCP 20 §5.2 is quite a bit nicer IMO if
you have a large number of small classless blocks to maintain -- on the
receiving side, you can maintain PTRs from many separate blocks in a
single zone. (And because there are no delegations from the provider to
the customer, there's no NS RRset to be synchronized.)
Unfortunately quite a few providers have reverse DNS provisioning
systems that can only do the §4 scheme.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmonds(a)debian.org
4. In the template definition, %s translates to
the zone name, with
the exception of the root zone.
Hi all,
I have not yet tried the templates but I'm concerned about handling of
BCP 20 classless reverse zones like 192/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa