Hi Robert, thanks for the nudge. I agree, it's a confusing name.
I've added a clarification in the documentation, and updated news in 0260c0a
Marek
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Edmonds <edmonds(a)debian.org>
Date: 29 August 2014 03:44
Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] multimaster docs?
To: knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
Hi,
Would it be possible to pick a slightly less confusing name for this
feature? Maybe something like "XFR master failover". At first I
thought of this:
Hi Nicolas,
there isn't much to point. The `xfr-in` clause in the configuration
accepts multiple remotes.
The first in the list is treated as primary, and should it fail, the
next would be used as a failover.
We don't support any load balancing of forwarded updates nor transfers
between the masters,
or any other tricky operations.
Best,
Marek
On 28 August 2014 16:41, Nicolás Reynolds <fauno(a)endefensadelsl.org> wrote:
hi, i see knot 1.5.0 has multimaster support but i can't find more
info/docs on this, can you point me to it?
--
D
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
--
Robert Edmonds
edmonds(a)debian.org
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz