Ah, sorry, I didn't get that before. We might add that to our todo list and add it to
some future version. Anyway is the overhead through local syslog that big?
Ondřej Surý
On 9. 3. 2013, at 21:18, <jh(a)netriplex.com> wrote:
Thanks,
I was looking for the ability to send directly and not to have the local syslog daemon
forward/relay it. But we can do that.
Jonathan
From: Ondřej Surý [mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:34 PM
To: <jh(a)netriplex.com>
Cc: <knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz>
Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] syslog server?
Hi Jonathan,
syslog is already there, see the full knot.conf sample:
https://redmine.labs.nic.cz/projects/knot-dns/repository/revisions/master/e…
Or example in the user manual:
https://jenkins.labs.nic.cz/job/Knot%20DNS/Slaves=Debian-6-64b/lastSuccessf…
Ondřej Surý
On 9. 3. 2013, at 14:59, <jh(a)netriplex.com> wrote:
Hello,
Is there any plan to add the ability to allow logging to a syslog server vs.
a log file?
Regards,
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users