- knot-resolver-users - lists.nic.cz

by Aleš Mrázek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.7.0 has been released! Security - avoid excessive TCP reconnections in a few more cases Like before, the remote server had to behave nonsensically in order to inflict this upon itself, but it might be abusable for DoS. We thank Ivan Jedek from OryxLabs for reporting this. Improvements - forwarding mode: tweak dealing with failures from forwarders, in particular prefer sending CD=0 upstream (!1392) Bugfixes - fix unusual timestamp format in debug dumps of records (!1386) - adjust linker options; it should help less common platforms (!1384) - hints module: fix names inside home.arpa. (!1406) - EDNS padding (RFC 8467) compatibility with knot-dns 3.3 libs (!1422) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.7.0/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.7.0.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.7.0.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.7.0/ -- Ales Mrazek PGP: 3057 EE9A 448F 362D 7420 5A77 9AB1 20DA 0A76 F6DE

1 rok, 4 měsíce

1
0
0 0

PID file path

by snowmailer＠gmail.com

Is there any way to write PID file to /var/run or so with knot-resolver? I can't find any info in documentation about it.

1 rok, 5 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Knot Resolver - redirect wildcard domain

by Milan Jeskynka Kazatel

Hello, could you please help me with knot resolver configuration in the case when I need to redirect each variation for the domain to some address. e.g. www.example.com, m.example.com, domain.example.com ... like wildcard record *.example.com 10.0.0.50 In my configuration is it handeled by file with static records -- load static records hints.add_hosts('/etc/knot-resolver/static_records.txt') which contains address to be redirected and the domain. 10.0.0.50 1xbet.com 10.0.0.50 thelotter.com 10.0.0.50 webmoneycasino.com 10.0.0.50 betworld.com 10.0.0.50 bosscasino.eu 10.0.0.50 sportingbull.com But I´m not able to handle the correct syntax for a wildcard domain redirection. Best regards, -- Smil Milan Jeskyňka Kazatel

1 rok, 5 měsíců

3
7
0 0

Setting up to use the OpenNIC root zone

by Ed V.

Hoping someone can help... Built Knot Resolver v5.6.0 from source. It works and resolves correctly for "regular" TLDs. However, I would like to point it to OpenNIC for resolution /forwarding so that I can resolve the expanded /alternative TLDs. Default configuration with: policy.add(policy.all( policy.FORWARD( {'2001:19f0:b001:379:5400:3ff:fe68:1cc6', '138.197.140.189', '2600:3c04::f03c:93ff:febd:be27', '45.61.49.203'}))) and it fails to find "grep.geek" using the standard root zone /hints: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 22871 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;grep.geek. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: . 86077 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2023050902 1800 900 604800 86400 So I checked the Documentation site and found "hints.root" which theoretically will override any other root hints. Using the OpenNIC root zone file (downloads as "db.root") I set: hints.root ({ ['ns13.opennic.glue.'] = { '2a01:4f8:192:43a5::2', '144.76.103.143' } }) in kresd.conf. Still no joy - "grep.geek" is NXDOMAIN from a.root-servers.net again. Any thoughts? Things I might have missed along the way?

1 rok, 7 měsíců

3
5
0 0

DoH connection closed after 10 seconds

by Blažej Krajňák

Hello, it's me again :) I just want to make sure if behaviour of Knot Resolver is correct. I implemented DDR mechanism to discover DoH / DoT DNS servers. My Macbook with Ventura successfully discovered DoH server and started to use it. But: Knot Resolver sends 10 seconds after establishing FIN,ACK packet and connection is correctly closed. From this moment, Macbook starts to use DNS over UDP again and will retry DoH connection after 10-30s later. Then it uses DoH server again for 10 seconds .... Is this behaviour correct? Should Macbook sends some keepalive messages to prevent connection closing? Or should Macbook reopen DoH connection more quickly? Thanks, Blažej

1 rok, 9 měsíců

2
3
0 0

Policy based on destination IP

by Blažej Krajňák

Hello, is there any correct way how to do query policy based on destination IP (IP which processed the query)? Like view:addr but on the dst address. I found that function view.addr(_, subnet, rules, dst) contains DST parameter but I'm not sure how to use it. I also found function view.rule_dst(action, subnet) but still get errors: error: /usr/lib/knot-resolver/kres_modules/view.lua:103: attempt to index local 'req' (a number value) Thanks Blažej

1 rok, 10 měsíců

2
3
0 0

Implementing DDR SVCB record

by Blažej Krajňák

Hi there, I'm trying to implement SVCB record "_dns.resolver.arpa" for DDR mechanism for our AS50242 recursive resolvers. When I look on Cloudflare or Google implementation, they answer with "ADDITIONAL SECTION" also. kdig _dns.resolver.arpa @8.8.8.8 type64 ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY; status: NOERROR; id: 61402 ;; Flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1; ANSWER: 2; AUTHORITY: 0; ADDITIONAL: 4 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;; _dns.resolver.arpa. IN SVCB ;; ANSWER SECTION: _dns.resolver.arpa. 86400 IN SVCB 1 dns.google. alpn=dot _dns.resolver.arpa. 86400 IN SVCB 2 dns.google. alpn=h2,h3 key7="/dns-query{?dns}" ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: dns.google. 86400 IN A 8.8.8.8 dns.google. 86400 IN A 8.8.4.4 dns.google. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:4860:4860::8888 dns.google. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:4860:4860::8844 In Knot Resolver documentation is an example how to answer for SVCB request but without addition section. policy.add( policy.domains( policy.ANSWER( { [kres.type.SVCB] = { rdata=kres.parse_rdata({ 'SVCB 1 resolver.example. alpn=dot ipv4hint=192.0.2.1 ipv6hint=2001:db8::1', 'SVCB 2 resolver.example. mandatory=key65380 alpn=h2 key65380=/dns-query{?dns}', }), ttl=5 } } ), { todname('_testing.domain') })) Can anyone help me, how to add additional section to answer? Do we need to use policy.custom_action(state, request)? Thanks! Blažej

1 rok, 10 měsíců

3
5
0 0

Knot Resolver 5.6.0

by Aleš Mrázek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.6.0 has been released! Security - avoid excessive TCP reconnections in some cases (!1380) For example, a DNS server that just closes connections without answer could cause lots of work for the resolver (and itself, too). The number of connections could be up to around 100 per client's query. We thank Xiang Li from NISL Lab, Tsinghua University, and Xuesong Bai and Qifan Zhang from DSP Lab, UCI. Improvements - daemon: feed server selection with more kinds of bad-answer events (!1380) - cache.max_ttl(): lower the default from six days to one day and apply both limits to the first uncached answer already (!1323 #127) - depend on jemalloc, preferably, to improve memory usage (!1353) - no longer accept DNS messages with trailing data (!1365) - policy.STUB: avoid applying aggressive DNSSEC denial proofs (!1364) - policy.STUB: avoid copying +dnssec flag from client to upstream (!1364) Bugfixes - policy.DEBUG_IF: don't print client's packet unconditionally (!1366) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.6.0/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.6.0.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.6.0.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.6.0/ -- Ales Mrazek PGP: 3057 EE9A 448F 362D 7420 5A77 9AB1 20DA 0A76 F6DE

1 rok, 11 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot Resolver 5.5.3

by Aleš Mrázek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.5.3 has been released! Security - fix CPU-expensive DoS by malicious domains - CVE-2022-40188 Improvements - fix config_tests on macOS (both HW variants) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.5.3/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.5.3.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.5.3.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.5.3/ -- Ales Mrazek PGP: 3057 EE9A 448F 362D 7420 5A77 9AB1 20DA 0A76 F6DE

2 roky, 3 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Resolving problem connectivity.samsung.com.cn even on dual-stack

by Blažej Krajňák

Hello everyone, at AS50242 we experience problem with resolving connectivity.samsung.com.cn We run two servers, each with 4 instances. Both servers have working dual-stack (v4/v6). knot-dnsutils/unknown,now 3.1.1-cznic.1 amd64 [installed] knot-resolver-module-http/unknown,now 5.5.0-cznic.1 all [installed,automatic] knot-resolver-release/unknown,now 1.9-1 all [installed] knot-resolver/unknown,now 5.5.0-cznic.1 amd64 [installed] Dnsviz shows problem reaching few IPv6 servers of .cn TLD via UDP. I can not understand, why both of our servers response with SERVFAIL. Any ideas how to troubleshoot more? Thank you, Blažej

2 roky, 3 měsíce

3
7
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

knot-resolver-users