On 17/05/2024 22.43, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> I think the question is whether Knot Resolver follows the letter of
> the RFC, like BIND, or whether it is less strict.
I'm not aware of RFCs saying that resolvers should fail in such
situations. My understanding is more like it's allowed not to work.
Anyway, it would be better to continue this thread on
knot-resolver-users(a)lists.nic.cz
(I already have posted there about this a couple days ago.)
--Vladimir
On 14/05/2024 08.10, Josef Karliak via knot-dns-users wrote:
>
> ISC bind is strict about CNAME of NS server:
>
> skipping nameserver 'aa.bb.cz' *because it is a CNAME*, while
> resolving '9.4/4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa/PTR'.
>
> How about Knot resolver ?
>
Hello. I believe there is neither effort to disallow them nor to make
them work. Off the top of my head I'm not sure how it will be in
practice; you could just try. Either way, please don't use them.
(I replied to the correct mailing-list.)
--Vladimir